Literature DB >> 6121479

Ischemic pain relief in patients with acute myocardial infarction by intravenous atenolol.

D R Ramsdale, E B Faragher, D H Bennett, C L Bray, C Ward, J M Cruickshank, S Yusuf, P Sleight.   

Abstract

Pain relief in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, atenolol, was demonstrated by three separate studies. First, 18 patients were randomized to double-blind intravenous atenolol (5 mg) or saline immediately after admission, followed by oral atenolol (50 mg) or placebo 10 minutes later. In patients receiving atenolol, pain relief coincided with reduction in heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and HR X SBP product (p less than 0.05); however, pain and these parameters were unchanged by placebo. The degree of pain relief was related to the reduction in cardiac work achieved (r = 0.725; p less than 0.001). A second open study involving 22 patients receiving intravenous atenolol (5 to 15 mg) early after AMI showed ischemic pain relief in 17 patients. They achieved a more significant reduction in HR X SBP product than those whose pain remained unchanged (p = 0.004). Finally, a retrospective study of 163 patients randomized to either atenolol or no beta blockade early after AMI revealed that patients receiving atenolol needed less opiate analgesia after admission (p less than 0.001). The safety of this therapy was illustrated by a decreased incidence of left heart failure and atrial fibrillation and no tendency to second- and third-degree heart block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6121479     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90330-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  14 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of pain in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Herlitz; A Hjalmarson; F Waagstein
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-01

2.  Successful termination of combined rapid atrial flutter/fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia by intravenous sotalol.

Authors:  D R Ramsdale; C Peterson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Beta adrenoceptor antagonists after myocardial infarction--where are we now?

Authors:  D A Chamberlain
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1983-02

4.  Limitation of myocardial infarct size. Present status.

Authors:  S Yusuf; P Sleight
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Early intravenous beta-blockade in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  P Sleight; S Yusuf; D Ramsdale; P Rossi; R Peto; D Bennett; C Bray; L Furse
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Similar antiischemic effects of intracoronary atenolol and nifedipine during brief coronary occlusions in humans.

Authors:  S Ghio; S De Servi; L Angoli; E Bramucci; E Eleuteri; S Raffaghello; G Specchia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.727

7.  Comparative haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous propranolol and pindolol in patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  B Silke; G I Nelson; R C Ahuja; R C Okoli; S H Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Effect of metoprolol on chest pain in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Herlitz; A Hjalmarson; S Holmberg; K Pennert; K Swedberg; A Vedin; F Waagstein; A Waldenström; H Wedel; L Wilhelmsen
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1984-04

9.  Is the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) of beta-blocking compounds relevant in acute myocardial infarction?

Authors:  B Silke; S P Verma; R C Ahuja; M Hussain; M Hafizullah; G Reynolds; G I Nelson; S H Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Combined receptor intervention and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D A Chamberlain; R Vincent
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.