Literature DB >> 6151893

Combined receptor intervention and myocardial infarction.

D A Chamberlain, R Vincent.   

Abstract

The aims of treatment in acute myocardial infarction are to limit evolving muscle necrosis, prevent heart failure, maintain electrical stability, and preserve the coronary circulation to avoid progressive or recurrent infarction. No single treatment achieves all these objectives. The rationale for the use of adrenoceptor blocking drugs is that they will oppose the effects of the increased sympathomimetic activity which follows acute infarction and which may adversely affect outcome. More is known of the clinical use of pure beta-blockade than of combined alpha- and beta-blockade with labetalol but in theory combined receptor blockade will produce additional beneficial effects over beta-blockade alone. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists have a theoretical role in limiting infarct size. They may reduce the oxygen deficit of jeopardised though potentially viable tissue, limiting infarct size by their favourable effect on heart rate, systolic pressure, contractility, and metabolic pathways. That beta-blockade reduces myocardial damage has been confirmed in animal studies. Studies in man using enzyme release or R wave scoring as indicators of infarct size also suggest that oral or intravenous beta-blockers after infarction encourage myocardial salvage. Few studies have been reported in which the effects of combined alpha- and beta-blockade on infarct size have been determined. The actions of a dual blocking agent are more complex and the outcome less predictable than from beta-blockade alone: the advantages of the beta-blocking component will be retained while the alpha-blocking component may conceivably further diminish oxygen demand by reducing systolic pressure and heart size. Less favourably, coronary perfusion pressure may also fall. It is apparent that further clinical studies are needed. Adrenergic blockade may be used to prevent or treat ventricular arrhythmias which develop after infarction in the face of heightened sympathetic tone and continued ischaemia. Clinical and experimental evidence points to the efficacy of beta-blockade in ischaemia-related arrhythmias, but beta-blockade alone is probably ineffective against arrhythmias arising during reperfusion. In experimental studies, alpha-blockers are effective against both forms of arrhythmia although the doses required for reperfusion effects may produce unacceptable hypotension in clinical use. It is possible that combined alpha- and beta-blockade may have broader antiarrhythmic activity than beta-blockers alone but present clinical data on the value of labetalol in controlling postinfarction arrhythmias are sparse.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6151893     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198400282-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  66 in total

Review 1.  Electrophysiology and pharmacology of cardiac arrhythmias. IX. Cardiac electrophysiologic effects of beta adrenergic receptor stimulation and blockade. Part A.

Authors:  A L Wit; B F Hoffman; M R Rosen
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Alterations of fibrinolysis and blood coagulation induced by exercise, and the role of beta-adrenergic-receptor stimulation.

Authors:  R J Cohen; S E Epstein; L S Cohen; L H Dennis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1968-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The reduction of infarct size--an idea whose time (for testing) has come.

Authors:  E Braunwald; P R Maroko
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Haemodynamic effects of intravenous labetalol in hypertensive patients with obstructive coronary heart disease complicated by acute myocardial infarction of recent origin.

Authors:  K D Mulac; S Meryn
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Sympathetic control of coronary circulation.

Authors:  E O Feigl
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Vulnerability to ventricular fibrillation during acute coronary arterial occlusion and release.

Authors:  P J Axelrod; R L Verrier; B Lown
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Development of congestive heart failure after treatment with metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Herlitz; A Hjalmarson; S Holmberg; K Swedberg; A Vedin; F Waagstein; A Waldenström; H Wedel; L Wilhelmsen; C Wilhelmsson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1984-05

8.  Comparison of haemodynamic dose-response effects of beta- and alpha-beta-blockade in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B Silke; G I Nelson; R C Ahuja; C Walker; S H Taylor
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Nifedipine reduces arrhythmias but does not alter prostanoid release during coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion in anaesthetised greyhounds.

Authors:  S J Coker; J R Parratt
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.105

10.  Protective effect of propranolol in threatened myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R M Norris; E D Clarke; N L Sammel; W M Smith; B Williams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-10-28       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Antiarrhythmic therapy with β-receptor antagonists].

Authors:  G C Grönefeld; D Bänsch
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2010-11-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.