Literature DB >> 6151504

Is the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) of beta-blocking compounds relevant in acute myocardial infarction?

B Silke, S P Verma, R C Ahuja, M Hussain, M Hafizullah, G Reynolds, G I Nelson, S H Taylor.   

Abstract

The relevance of the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) of beta-blocking compounds to the clinical therapeutics of acute myocardial infarction was evaluated in 20 patients with an uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction by comparing the haemodynamic effects of equivalent beta-blocking doses of propranolol (non-cardioselective; no ISA) and pindolol (non-cardioselective; 50% ISA). Consecutive eligible male patients admitted to a Coronary Care Unit were randomised following a 1 h control period to two separate studies. In Study 1 the short-term dose-response effects of propranolol (1-8 mg) or pindolol (0.1-0.8 mg) were assessed. In Study 2 comparison of the effects of single i.v. propranolol (8 mg) and pindolol (0.8 mg) doses was undertaken over 6 h. Haemodynamic variables and thermodilution cardiac output were subsequently recorded to compare the effects of each drug on the circulation. The plasma concentrations of propranolol and pindolol were in the recognised therapeutic range. Both drugs were clinically well-tolerated, the changes induced in haemodynamic variables following each drug demonstrated effective beta-blockade. Within the limits of the experimental protocol, these data did not suggest definite haemodynamic advantage for ISA of pindolol in acute myocardial infarction. These findings are perhaps due to sympathetic activation in acute myocardial infarction attenuating the haemodynamic impact of ISA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6151504     DOI: 10.1007/BF00556884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  26 in total

1.  Factors influencing infarct size following experimental coronary artery occlusions.

Authors:  P R Maroko; J K Kjekshus; B E Sobel; T Watanabe; J W Covell; J Ross; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous beta-blocking drugs with different ancillary properties in patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  S H Taylor; B Silke; P S Lee; A Hilal
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Pharmacokinetic and haemodynamic studies with labetalol in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B Silke; G I Nelson; R C Ahuja; S Choudhury; S H Taylor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Cardiac dose-response relationships of oral and intravenous pindolol.

Authors:  S G Carruthers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Free noradrenaline and adrenaline excretion in relation to clinical syndromes following myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C Valori; M Thomas; J Shillingford
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Speed of onset of pharmacodynamic activity of propranolol, practolol, oxprenolol and metoprolol after intravenous infection in man.

Authors:  R Lochan; B Silke; S H Taylor
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Ischemic pain relief in patients with acute myocardial infarction by intravenous atenolol.

Authors:  D R Ramsdale; E B Faragher; D H Bennett; C L Bray; C Ward; J M Cruickshank; S Yusuf; P Sleight
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Electrocardiographic surface mapping of the heart following myocardial infarction and the influence of beta-blockade.

Authors:  D S Reid; L J Pelides; J P Shillingford; M Thomas
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 9.  Propranolol and experimental myocardial infarction: substrate effects.

Authors:  L H Opie; M Thomas
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Protective effect of propranolol in threatened myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R M Norris; E D Clarke; N L Sammel; W M Smith; B Williams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-10-28       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Differences in haemodynamic response to beta-blocking drugs between stable coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B Silke; M A Frais; S P Verma; G Reynolds; S H Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.