Literature DB >> 6093190

Magnetic resonance imaging of the lymph nodes: comparison with CT.

G C Dooms, H Hricak, L E Crooks, C B Higgins.   

Abstract

This retrospective study of 144 patients was made to (a) assess the potential of magnetic resonance (MR) for demonstrating lymph nodes using spin-echo technique, (b) compare the MR results with those of CT, and (c) determine the optimal pulse-sequence interval (TR) and echo-delay time (TE) for imaging lymph nodes. The reported CT findings on normal lymph nodes were compared with MR findings in 60 patients who underwent MR imaging of the neck (20 patients), chest (20 patients), abdomen (10 patients), and pelvis (10 patients) for conditions other than lymph node disease. The results showed that CT is presently better than MR for imaging neck and abdominal lymph nodes less than 13 mm in diameter. The ability of MR to demonstrate normal-size (less than 10 mm) lymph nodes in the chest was comparable to that of CT. In addition, MR scans of 84 patients with proven abnormal lymph nodes (8 neck, 49 chest, and 27 abdomen and pelvis) were assessed: in 72 patients, these nodes had also been imaged by CT. MR and CT gave similar results with abnormal lymph nodes (greater than 13 or 15 mm), but MR displayed these nodes better because of its excellent soft-tissue contrast resolution. MR can clearly differentiate abnormal lymph nodes from normal fat, muscle, vessels, adult thymus, thyroid, and diaphragmatic crura, as well as from primary tumor and lymphoceles. Optimal demonstration of lymph nodes with MR required two sequences: one with a short TR and one with a long TR and long TE. Preliminary results indicate that MR holds great promise for the demonstration of lymph nodes in every part of the body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6093190     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.153.3.6093190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

Review 1.  Computerised tomography in the staging of Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Sarah J Vinnicombe; Rodney H Reznek
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  What is the pelvic lymph node normal size? Determination from normal MRI examinations.

Authors:  Marjorie Ramirez; Pierre Ingrand; Jean-Pierre Richer; Guillaume Herpe; Guillaume Vesselle; Samy Boucebci; Jean-Pierre Tasu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  The role of popliteal lymph nodes in differentiating rheumatoid arthritis from osteoarthritis by using CE 3D FSPGR MR imaging: relationship of the inflamed synovial volume.

Authors:  Yong-Min Huh; Sungjun Kim; Jin-Suck Suh; Ho- Taek Song; Kijun Song; Kyoo-Ho Shin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  MRI sequences for the detection of individual lymph nodes in regional breast radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Tristan C F van Heijst; Bram van Asselen; Ruud M Pijnappel; Marissa Cloos-van Balen; Jan J W Lagendijk; Desirée van den Bongard; Mariëlle E P Philippens
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck tumors.

Authors:  R B Lufkin; W Hanafee
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 6.  Radiologic imaging modalities, including magnetic resonance, for evaluating lymph nodes.

Authors:  G C Dooms; H Hricak
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1986-01

7.  Is MRI helpful in assessing the distance of the tumour from the internal os in patients with cervical cancer below FIGO Stage IB2?

Authors:  P R Bhosale; R B Iyer; P Ramalingam; K M Schmeler; W Wei; R L Bassett; P T Ramirez; M Frumovitz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Ferumoxtran-10, a superparamagnetic iron oxide as a magnetic resonance enhancement agent for imaging lymph nodes: a phase 2 dose study.

Authors:  Patricia A Hudgins; Yoshimi Anzai; Marie R Morris; Maria A Lucas
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Lymph node staging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sandeep Sankineni; Anna M Brown; Michele Fascelli; Yan Mee Law; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  CT and MRI of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R Forstner; H Hricak; S White
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.