Literature DB >> 7894290

CT and MRI of ovarian cancer.

R Forstner1, H Hricak, S White.   

Abstract

Among the gynecologic malignancies, ovarian cancer is second most common in incidence. However, unlike the other gynecologic cancers, its mortality has decreased only minimally during the last two decades [1]. Only recently, preliminary studies suggest promising results for ovarian cancer screening using transvaginal ultrasound in combination with serum Ca 125 levels [22,23]. Exploratory laparotomy has been the mainstay in the management of ovarian cancer, as it offers histopathological evaluation as well as cytoreduction. However, it is limited by its inaccuracy with understaging in 30-40% at initial presentation. Cross-sectional imaging contributes valuable information toward preoperative surgical and management planning. The proper surgical approach can be selected, the need for preoperative chemotherapeutic debulking can be assessed, and the surgeon will be forewarned of the need for assistance from a gynecologic oncologic surgeon or gastrointestinal oncologic surgeon if a complicated surgical procedure or bowel resection is indicated. CT is established as the primary imaging modality for characterization of ovarian tumors and ovarian cancer staging, while MR is emerging as a problem-solving modality. MR seems to be superior to CT in lesion characterization, in evaluation of local extent of tumor, and in tumor implants involving the hemidiaphragm and liver surface. The role of spiral CT has yet to be explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7894290     DOI: 10.1007/bf00199633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  30 in total

1.  Value of lipid- and water-suppression MR images in distinguishing between blood and lipid within ovarian masses.

Authors:  R Kier; R C Smith; S M McCarthy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging.

Authors:  K Togashi; K Nishimura; I Kimura; Y Tsuda; K Yamashita; T Shibata; Y Nakano; J Konishi; I Konishi; T Mori
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Current trends in MR imaging of the female pelvis.

Authors:  H Hricak
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  Computed tomography of gynecologic neoplasms.

Authors:  J W Walsh
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Intraperitoneal contrast material improves the CT detection of peritoneal metastases.

Authors:  R A Halvorsen; C Panushka; G J Oakley; J G Letourneau; L L Adcock
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential with peritoneal implants.

Authors:  D M Gershenson; E G Silva
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Ovarian cancer screening.

Authors:  J R van Nagell; P D DePriest; H H Gallion; E J Pavlik
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Authors:  P Jacquet; J S Jelinek; M A Steves; P H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Computer-tomographic evaluation of gynecologic tumors.

Authors:  M Kormano; M Grönroos
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Epithelial tumors of the ovary: comparison of MR and CT findings.

Authors:  M A Ghossain; J N Buy; C Lignères; M Bazot; K Hassen; L Malbec; D Hugol; J B Truc; Y Decroix; P Poitout
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of multidetector CT and MR imaging in the differentiation of adnexal masses.

Authors:  A C Tsili; C Tsampoulas; M Argyropoulou; I Navrozoglou; Y Alamanos; E Paraskevaidis; S C Efremidis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Optical imaging-guided cancer therapy with fluorescent nanoparticles.

Authors:  Shan Jiang; Muthu Kumara Gnanasammandhan; Yong Zhang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Role of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the assessment of suspected recurrent ovarian cancer: correlation with clinical or histological findings.

Authors:  Hyun Hoon Chung; Won Jun Kang; Jae Weon Kim; Noh-Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song; June-Key Chung; Soon-Beom Kang; Hyo-Pyo Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Multidetector CT predictors of incomplete resection in primary cytoreduction of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Dae Chul Jung; Sokbom Kang; Min Ju Kim; Sang Yoon Park; Hyun Beom Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  MR imaging in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S A A Sohaib; R H Reznek
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  CT of ovarian cancer: 3D cinematic rendering for preoperative evaluation.

Authors:  Yi-Ren Jin; Xie-Lan Yang; Qin-Qing Li; Zhi-Ling Yan; Hong-Ying Yang; Chengde Liao
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.234

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.