Literature DB >> 6033555

Some effects of fixed-interval duration on response rate in a two-component chain schedule.

S B Kendall.   

Abstract

In Exp. I three pigeons were trained on a two-component chain schedule. Responding on a 1-min variable-interval schedule in the initial component led to a sequence of two fixed-interval schedules in the terminal component. The rate of reinforcement in the terminal component was kept constant while the values of the two fixed intervals were varied. Three combinations of fixed-interval schedules were studied, FI 0.25, FI 1.75 (minutes) or FI 1.00, FI 1.00, or FI 1.75, FI 0.25. The rate for each subject declined in the initial component as the value of the first fixed interval was increased. Experiment II was conducted to assess the role of the second fixed-interval schedule in the terminal component in determining the rate of responding in the initial component. For each chain schedule the rate of responding in the initial component was determined both with and without the second of the sequence of fixed intervals. In all three cases the rate of responding in the initial component decreased when the second fixed interval was removed. Increasing the first fixed interval in Exp. I had a greater effect on variable-interval performance than did the removal of the second fixed interval in Exp. II.

Mesh:

Year:  1967        PMID: 6033555      PMCID: PMC1338333          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  10 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Toward a quantitative theory of secondary reinforcement.

Authors:  L B WYCKOFF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF OBSERVING RESPONSES IN A MIXED FI-FR SCHEDULE.

Authors:  S B KENDALL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; L R GOLLUB
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires.

Authors:  J D FINDLEY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Amount of reinforcement and free-operant responding.

Authors:  R E KEESEY; J W KLING
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Periodic reinforcement interval and number of periodic reinforcements as parameters of response strength.

Authors:  M P WILSON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-02

10.  The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  F C Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  Development of key-pecking, pause, and ambulation during extended exposure to a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  Meredith S Berry; Brian D Kangas; Marc N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Delay or rate of food delivery as determiners of response rate.

Authors:  R L Shull; D J Spear; A E Bryson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Response-dependent prechoice effects on foraging-related choice.

Authors:  W A Williams; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Responding maintained under intermittent schedules of electric-shock presentation: "Safety" or schedule effects?

Authors:  E F Malagodi; M L Gardner; S E Ward; R L Magyar
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice and multiple reinforcers.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice and number of reinforcers.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.