Literature DB >> 598095

Spinal cord monitoring during operative treatment of the spine.

C L Nash, R A Lorig, L A Schatzinger, R H Brown.   

Abstract

Twenty-six orthopedic and 8 neurosurgical patients undergoing spine surgery had spinal cord monitoring before, during, and after operation using somatosensory, averaged cortical evoked responses. Although no inherent risks were apparent in the technical application of this form of spinal cord monitoring, there are limitations that have yet to be evaluated. Classically, somatosensory evoked responses have been considered a function of the posterior columns; however, the results of these studies indicate that more than the function of the dorsal columns alone can be evaluated with this technique. In addition, much remains to be learned regarding the changes in signals noted and the corresponding clinical conditions. Techniques more sophisticated than visual evaluation of response patterns must be established and more sophisticated methods of analysis must be developed. Despite the need for more knowledge of the nature of this system and the correlation between evoked responses and clinical conditions, the system has proved to be effective and to have great potential for improving spine and spinal cord surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 598095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  51 in total

1.  Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Authors:  J Richard Toleikis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Intraoperative applications of the H-reflex and F-response: a tutorial.

Authors:  Ronald E Leppanen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Intraoperative monitoring of segmental spinal nerve root function with free-run and electrically-triggered electromyography and spinal cord function with reflexes and F-responses. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Authors:  Ronald E Leppanen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  History of the development of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Tamaki; Seiji Kubota
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Risk factors for positioning-related somatosensory evoked potential changes in 3946 spinal surgeries.

Authors:  Samyuktha R Melachuri; Jeffrey R Balzer; Manasa K Melachuri; David Ninaci; Katherine Anetakis; Jaspreet Kaur; Donald J Crammond; Parthasarathy D Thirumala
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Intraoperative Multimodal Monitoring in Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies of the Lumbar Spine: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Jianning Shao; Bryan S Lee; Dominic Pelle; Maxwell Y Lee; Jason Savage; Joseph E Tanenbaum; Thomas E Mroz; Michael P Steinmetz
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  An evaluation of multimodal spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery: a single centre experience of 354 operations.

Authors:  S Bhagat; A Durst; H Grover; J Blake; L Lutchman; A S Rai; R Crawford
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Neuromonitoring.

Authors:  W Hacke
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Neuromodulation and the role of electrodiagnostic techniques.

Authors:  Karen L Noblett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring in corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Evaluation of 354 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Vishal K Kundnani; Lisa Zhu; Hh Tak; Hk Wong
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.