Literature DB >> 5947615

The problem of routine circumcision.

H Patel.   

Abstract

One hundred male infants were studied at the Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, to determine the incidence and complications of routine circumcision. The parents were also interviewed concerning the reason for operation.In these 100 infants, complications, usually minor, were very common, and included hemorrhage (35), meatal ulcers (31), infection (eight), phimosis (one) and meatal stenosis.The reasons given for operation were prophylactic-to avoid the psychological trauma of later operations for infection, phimosis and "troubles" (40), cleanliness (11) and phimosis (four). The remaining cases were for social and other non-medical reasons. Attitudes of parents and physicians regarding circumcision varied from firm belief in its value to a casual approach. One-half of the babies had partial circumcisions, confirming previous suspicions that non-Jewish males frequently had partial operations. Partial operations do not always guarantee cleanliness and probably do not eliminate the risk of penile carcinoma in all cases, if smegma is carcinogenic. Routine circumcisions spare a few children psychologically traumatic operations at a later date and relieve parents of anxiety about the future of the uncircumcised child. This should be balanced against the complications which, although usually minor, may occasionally be serious.Between 1961 and 1962, at the Kingston General Hospital, 349 (48%) of 727 male newborn babies were routinely circumcised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1966        PMID: 5947615      PMCID: PMC1936659     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  20 in total

1.  ROUTINE NON-RITUAL CIRCUMCISION IN INFANCY. A NEW LOOK AT AN OLD OPERATION.

Authors:  C WEISS
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 1.168

2.  ROUTINE CIRCUMCISION. A PROBLEM FOR MEDICINE.

Authors:  R A SHAW; W O ROBERTSON
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1963-08

3.  Circumcision of the newborn infant in the delivery room.

Authors:  E R MOELLER; E M MOSS
Journal:  U S Armed Forces Med J       Date:  1955-03

4.  Geographical pathology of cancer of the penis.

Authors:  M RIVEROS; R F LEBRON
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1963-06       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The question of circumcision.

Authors:  E L WYNDER; S D LICKLIDER
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1960 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Association of cervical cancer with circumcision of sexual partner.

Authors:  J E DUNN; P BUELL
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Carcinoma of the cervix: an epidemiologic study.

Authors:  M Terris; M C Oalmann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1960-12-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Incidence of tonsillectomy, circumcision, and appendicectomy among R.A.F. recruits.

Authors:  S CARNE
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1956-07-07

9.  The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision.

Authors:  D GAIRDNER
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1949-12-24

10.  The pros and cons of routine circumcision.

Authors:  D HOVSEPIAN
Journal:  Calif Med       Date:  1951-11
View more
  13 in total

1.  Male circumcision and HIV prevention. Some science would not have gone amiss.

Authors:  R S Van Howe; C J Cold; M R Storms
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-09

Review 2.  Prepuce health and childhood circumcision: Choices in Canada.

Authors:  Emmanuel O Abara
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  More about circumcision.

Authors:  T D Swafford
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1967-01-28       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  In defence of circumcision.

Authors:  P G Klotz
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1966-10-29       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Circumcision with the Plastibell device. A long-term follow-up.

Authors:  S M Sörensen; M R Sörensen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Benefits and risks of circumcision.

Authors:  E Warner; E Strashin
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  J S McKim
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Attitudes to infant circumcision.

Authors:  J L Reynolds; J M Szul
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen A Weiss; Natasha Larke; Daniel Halperin; Inon Schenker
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Case--control study of counselling against neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  P G Taylor
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.