Literature DB >> 6682004

Case--control study of counselling against neonatal circumcision.

P G Taylor.   

Abstract

After two serious complications had alerted physicians to the potential risks of routine neonatal circumcision, the circumcision rate in a regional general hospital decreased significantly (p less than 0.001), from approximately 40% to 20%, settling at the level claimed to prevail when physicians oppose circumcision. Following this decrease 219 consecutive pregnancies resulting in male infants were prospectively studied in order to identify factors associated with insistence on circumcision. Factors significantly associated with circumcision were the existence of an older brother (p less than 0.001), especially if circumcised (p less than 0.001), and delivery of prenatal care by an obstetrician rather than a general practitioner (p less than 0.05). Factors significantly associated with no circumcision were the fact that this infant was the first male born in the family (p = 0.001), delivery of prenatal and infant care by the same general practitioner (p less than 0.05) and a maternal age of 20 years or less (p less than 0.02). The circumcision status of the father, the marital status of the mother, the mother's intention to breast-feed, attendance of a primigravida at prenatal classes, delivery of infant care by a pediatrician and socioeconomic status did not appear to influence whether circumcision was performed. These data may assist physicians in understanding the potential effectiveness and limitations of counselling against circumcision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6682004      PMCID: PMC1875054     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Assoc J        ISSN: 0008-4409            Impact factor:   8.262


  7 in total

1.  Report of the ad hoc task force on circumcision.

Authors:  H C Thompson; L R King; E Knox; S B Korones
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Factors affecting the practice of circumcision.

Authors:  D A Patel; E G Flaherty; J Dunn
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1982-07

Review 3.  Benefits and risks of circumcision.

Authors:  E Warner; E Strashin
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Surgical circumcision of neonates: a history of its development.

Authors:  E Grossman; N A Posner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Current circumcision practices: Canada.

Authors:  J L Wirth
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The problem of routine circumcision.

Authors:  H Patel
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1966-09-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Routine circumcision of the newborn infant: a reappraisal.

Authors:  D A Grimes
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-01-15       Impact factor: 8.661

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.