Literature DB >> 16220278

Disclosing disease mechanisms with a spatio-temporal summation paradigm.

Andrew J Zele1, Rebecca K O'Loughlin, Robyn H Guymer, Algis J Vingrys.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We develop the logic for a stimulus that can evaluate cone-dependent spatial summation and detail the modelling and interpretation of thresholds obtained with this stimulus.
METHODS: Fifteen observers participated, including two young normals tested extensively in control experiments, and a clinical trial based on four observers with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), four age-similar controls and five young observers. Monocular spatial summation functions were measured with contrast-modulated Gabor targets that approximated the optimal visual contrast detector. Thresholds were returned from a yes/no adaptive psychophysical algorithm. By fine titration along the size domain it was demonstrated that the spatial summation of normal observers can be adequately described by a two-component model. A reduced set of variables are proposed for clinical applications and the model was applied to data derived using these variables in persons with AMD and age-similar controls.
RESULTS: We do not find a significant age-related loss of contrast sensitivity in our normal group. On the other hand, persons with early AMD exhibited a 0.41 log unit loss of sensitivity (P=0.04) from age-similar controls, without any change in their maximum summation area (A(max)).
CONCLUSIONS: The nature of the spatial summation is consistent with the interpretation that early AMD produces a decrease in cone input to post-receptoral mechanisms in the absence of neural remodelling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16220278     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-005-0121-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  46 in total

1.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  M P Sceniak; D L Ringach; M J Hawken; R Shapley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Spare the rods, save the cones in aging and age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  C A Curcio; C Owsley; G R Jackson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Loss of cone function in age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  Joanna A Phipps; Robyn H Guymer; Algis J Vingrys
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Fast psychophysical procedures for clinical testing.

Authors:  Joanna A Phipps; Andrew J Zele; Trung Dang; Algis J Vingrys
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Maximum likelihood estimation: the best PEST.

Authors:  A Pentland
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

6.  Spatial summation of the differential light threshold as a function of visual field location and age.

Authors:  K Latham; D Whitaker; J M Wild
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Spatial summation, contrast threshold, and aging.

Authors:  C Owsley; R Sekuler
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Human visual spatio-temporal frequency performance as a function of age.

Authors:  N Nameda; T Kawara; H Ohzu
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  The clinical grading of lens opacities.

Authors:  H R Taylor; S K West
Journal:  Aust N Z J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-02
View more
  6 in total

1.  Senescent changes in photopic spatial summation.

Authors:  Maka Malania; Frédéric Devinck; Kenneth Knoblauch; Peter B Delahunt; Joseph L Hardy; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Age-related changes in contrast gain related to the M and P pathways.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The ups and downs of global motion perception: a paradoxical advantage for smaller stimuli in the aging visual system.

Authors:  Claire V Hutchinson; Tim Ledgeway; Harriet A Allen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  A Comparison of Perimetric Results from a Tablet Perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients.

Authors:  Yu Xiang George Kong; Mingguang He; Jonathan G Crowston; Algis J Vingrys
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter.

Authors:  Algis J Vingrys; Jessica K Healey; Sheryl Liew; Veera Saharinen; Michael Tran; William Wu; George Y X Kong
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Scaling the size of perimetric stimuli reduces variability and returns constant thresholds across the visual field.

Authors:  Phillip Bedggood; Selwyn Marc Prea; Yu Xiang George Kong; Algis J Vingrys
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.