Literature DB >> 540597

Animal experimentation and its relevance to man.

D G Hoel.   

Abstract

The problem of quantitatively estimating human cancer risk based upon animal carcinogenesis studies is reviewed. Mathematical functions for dose-response relationships are discussed with particular emphasis on multistage models. These models are based upon a single cell somatic mutation theory for the carcinogenesis process. It is shown that the multistage model and others which incorporate background additively are well approximated in low dose region by a linear function. The relationship between time-to-tumor and the multistage model is indicated. This relationship is important when dealing with less than life time exposure such as with data from many occupational studies. Design of bioassay experiments and its impact on risk estimation is noted. Finally, the problem of species-to-species extrapolation is considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 540597      PMCID: PMC1637912          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.793225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  11 in total

1.  Lung cancer incidence in cigarette smokers: further analysis of Doll and Hill's data for British physicians.

Authors:  A Whittemore; B Altshuller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Uncertainty estimates for low-dose-rate extrapolations of animal carcinogenicity data.

Authors:  H Guess; K Crump; R Peto
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Confidence intervals and test of hypotheses concerning dose response relations inferred from animal carcinogenicity data.

Authors:  K S Crump; H A Guess; K L Deal
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Estimation of risks of irreversible, delayed toxicity.

Authors:  D G Hoel; D W Gaylor; R L Kirschstein; U Saffiotti; M A Schneiderman
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1975-09

5.  False-positive and false-negative rates for carcinogenicity screens.

Authors:  T R Fears; R E Tarone; K C Chu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Fundamental carcinogenic processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment.

Authors:  K S Crump; D G Hoel; C H Langley; R Peto
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in the Salmonella/microsome test: assay of 300 chemicals: discussion.

Authors:  J McCann; B N Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Estimation of "safe doses" in carcinogenic experiments.

Authors:  H O Hartley; R L Sielken
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The effect of dose on cancer latency period.

Authors:  H A Guess; D G Hoel
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec

10.  A new theory on cancer-inducing mechanism.

Authors:  C O NORDLING
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1953-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Developing standards for environmental toxicants: the need to consider abiotic environmental factors and microbe-mediated ecologic processes.

Authors:  H Babich; G Stotzky
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  Extrapolation of animal carcinogenicity data: limitations and pitfalls.

Authors:  M D Hogan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.