Literature DB >> 6825619

Extrapolation of animal carcinogenicity data: limitations and pitfalls.

M D Hogan.   

Abstract

Laboratory-generated animal bioassay data often serve as the basis for estimating potential human cancer risk. However, there is no single procedure that has been universally accepted as the method of choice for extrapolating experimentally observed results to the low exposure levels that are generally of public health concern. All of the models proposed to date suffer from various limitations. Therefore, the most prudent approach may be to rely primarily on the more conservative procedures such as linear extrapolation until a better understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying the process of carcinogenesis is attained. In addition to the choice of an extrapolation model, there are a variety of other factors, such as the incorporation of background cancer rates, the potential for synergistic reactions, differential pharmacokinetic effects and differences in exposure regimen, that can have a significant bearing on the extrapolation of animal carcinogenicity data to man.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6825619      PMCID: PMC1569384          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8347333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  17 in total

1.  Lung cancer incidence in cigarette smokers: further analysis of Doll and Hill's data for British physicians.

Authors:  A Whittemore; B Altshuller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  An improved Mantel-Bryan procedure for "safety" testing of carcinogens.

Authors:  N Mantel; N R Bohidar; C C Brown; J L Ciminera; J W Tukey
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  The age distribution of human cancer for carcinogenic exposures of varying intensity.

Authors:  A S Whittemore
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Open query: theoretical problems in the modified Mantel-Bryan procedure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Resolution of dose-response toxicity data for chemicals requiring metabolic activation: example--vinyl chloride.

Authors:  P J Gehring; P G Watanabe; C N Park
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 6.  Estimation of risks of irreversible, delayed toxicity.

Authors:  D G Hoel; D W Gaylor; R L Kirschstein; U Saffiotti; M A Schneiderman
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1975-09

7.  Incorporation of background in dose-response models.

Authors:  D G Hoel
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1980-01

8.  Mechanisms of carcinogenesis: dose response.

Authors:  P J Gehring; G E Blau
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct

9.  Fundamental carcinogenic processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment.

Authors:  K S Crump; D G Hoel; C H Langley; R Peto
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Estimation of "safe doses" in carcinogenic experiments.

Authors:  H O Hartley; R L Sielken
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Consensus report: mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of car exhausts and coal combustion emissions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.