Literature DB >> 975067

Fundamental carcinogenic processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment.

K S Crump, D G Hoel, C H Langley, R Peto.   

Abstract

Various possible models of carcinogenesis are analyzed with respect to low dose kinetics. The importance of background carcinogenesis upon the shape of the dose-response curve at low dose is emphasized. It is shown that, if carcinogenesis by an external agent acts additively with any already ongoing process, then under almost any model the response will be linear at low dose. Measures of the degree of linearity are obtained for multistage models of carcinogenesis, where it is shown that throughout the dose range where the extra risk is less than the spontaneous risk linear extrapolation must be quite accurate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 975067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  57 in total

1.  On use of the multistage dose-response model for assessing laboratory animal carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Daniela K Nitcheva; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Quantitative evaluation of DNA binding data for risk estimation and for classification of direct and indirect carcinogens.

Authors:  W K Lutz
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Evacuation criteria after a nuclear accident: a personal perspective.

Authors:  Richard Wilson
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  The problem of estimating safe dose levels in chemical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J Wahrendorf
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Carcinogenic risks of inorganic arsenic in perspective.

Authors:  D M Byrd; M L Roegner; J C Griffiths; S H Lamm; K S Grumski; R Wilson; S Lai
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  The problem of thresholds in chemical carcinogenesis some views on theoretical and practical aspects.

Authors:  R Preussmann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Arsenic: opportunity for risk assessment.

Authors:  G Stöhrer
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 8.  Quantification of ETS exposure in hospitality workers who have never smoked.

Authors:  Stefanie Kolb; Ulrike Brückner; Dennis Nowak; Katja Radon
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  An examination of radiation hormesis mechanisms using a multistage carcinogenesis model.

Authors:  H Schöllnberger; R D Stewart; R E J Mitchel; W Hofmann
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-10

10.  Issues in using human variability distributions to estimate low-dose risk.

Authors:  Kenny S Crump; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ravi P Subramaniam
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.