Literature DB >> 534158

Absolute and relative cues for the auditory perception of egocentric distance.

D H Mershon, J N Bowers.   

Abstract

Three experiments were performed to examine the reverberation cue to egocentric auditory distance and to determine the extent to which such a cue could provide 'absolute', as contrasted with 'relative', information about distance. In experiment 1 independent groups of blindfolded observers (200 altogether) were presented with broadband noise from a speaker at one of five different distances (0.55 to 8 m) in a normal hard-walled room. Half of each group of observers were presented with the sound at 0 deg azimuth, followed (after a delay) by the identical sound at 90 deg azimuth. The order of presentation was reversed for the remaining observers. Perceived distance varied significantly as a function of the physical distance to the speaker, even for the first presentations. The change in the binaural information between the 0 deg and 90 deg presentations did not significantly modify the results. For both orientations, near distances were overestimated and far distances were underestimated. Experiment 2 and 3 were designed to evaluate how much prior auditory exposure to the laboratory environment was necessary. A 200 Hz square-wave signal was presented from one of three distances (1, 2, or 6 m) to observers who had either minimal room information or an exposure which included talking within the room. Perceived distance varied significantly with physical distance regardless to exposure condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 534158     DOI: 10.1068/p080311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  12 in total

1.  Synchronizing to real events: subjective audiovisual alignment scales with perceived auditory depth and speed of sound.

Authors:  David Alais; Simon Carlile
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Perception of the relative distances of nearby sound sources.

Authors:  D H Ashmead; D LeRoy; R D Odom
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-04

3.  Auditory distance coding in rabbit midbrain neurons and human perception: monaural amplitude modulation depth as a cue.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Pavel Zahorik; Laurel H Carney; Brian B Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Evidence for enhanced discrimination of virtual auditory distance among blind listeners using level and direct-to-reverberant cues.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual signals bias auditory targets in azimuth and depth.

Authors:  Amanda L Bowen; Ramnarayan Ramachandran; Jeffrey A Muday; James A Schirillo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Intensity-invariant coding in the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Best Distance Perception in Virtual Audiovisual Environment.

Authors:  Hui Song; Ke Ma
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-28

8.  Auditory/visual distance estimation: accuracy and variability.

Authors:  Paul W Anderson; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-07

Review 9.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Pavel Zahorik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  An Auditory Illusion of Proximity of the Source Induced by Sonic Crystals.

Authors:  Ignacio Spiousas; Pablo E Etchemendy; Ramiro O Vergara; Esteban R Calcagno; Manuel C Eguia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.