Literature DB >> 2345684

Perception of the relative distances of nearby sound sources.

D H Ashmead1, D LeRoy, R D Odom.   

Abstract

The pressure of a sound varies systematically with a listener's distance from a sound source, providing a useful cue for perceiving changes in the distance between a listener and a sound-producing object. The pressure-discrimination hypothesis predicts that thresholds for discriminating changes in distance are constrained by the underlying ability to discriminate the resulting changes in sound pressure--specifically, that the smallest discriminable change in distance should be about 5% of the reference distance. Previous studies reported thresholds of about 5% for reference distances greater than a few meters but surprisingly worse thresholds for closer reference distances. In the present study, thresholds at two close distances, 1 and 2 m, were within the 5% range predicted from the pressure-discrimination hypothesis. Moreover, thresholds were significantly worse in a control condition in which the pressure cue was removed. Results of previous studies were adjusted to take into account the possibility of conservative response tendencies by the subjects. These adjusted findings agree well with the results of the present study and the pressure-discrimination hypothesis. It is concluded that variations in sound pressure are very useful for perceiving changes in listener-source distances, even at close distances.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2345684     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  5 in total

1.  An analysis of cues to auditory depth perception in free space.

Authors:  P D COLEMAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1963-05       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Head movement does not facilitate perception of the distance of a source of sound.

Authors:  W E Simpson; L D Stanton
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1973-03

3.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Absolute and relative cues for the auditory perception of egocentric distance.

Authors:  D H Mershon; J N Bowers
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Discrimination of relative distance in the auditory modality: the success and failure of the loudness discrimination hypothesis.

Authors:  T Z Strybel; D R Perrott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus spectrum on distance perception for nearby sources.

Authors:  Norbert Kopčo; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of Intensity Discrimination between Children Using Cochlear Implants and Typically Developing Children.

Authors:  Shubha Tak; Asha Yathiraj
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  Cooperative vocal control in marmoset monkeys via vocal feedback.

Authors:  Jung Yoon Choi; Daniel Y Takahashi; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Intensity-invariant coding in the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Effect of dual sensory loss on auditory localization: implications for intervention.

Authors:  Helen J Simon; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

Review 6.  Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Pavel Zahorik; Silvia Cirstea; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Brain-Machine Interfaces to Assist the Blind.

Authors:  Maurice Ptito; Maxime Bleau; Ismaël Djerourou; Samuel Paré; Fabien C Schneider; Daniel-Robert Chebat
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The detection of differences in the cues to distance by elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; Stuart Gatehouse; Julia Blaschke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Reaching nearby sources: comparison between real and virtual sound and visual targets.

Authors:  Gaëtan Parseihian; Christophe Jouffrais; Brian F G Katz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.