Literature DB >> 7079090

Independence versus interference in the perceptual processing of letters.

J L Santee, H E Egeth.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7079090     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  27 in total

1.  When preparation fails: disruptive effects of prior information on perceptual recognition.

Authors:  E E Smith; S E Haviland; L M Reder; H Brownell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Do noise masks terminate target processing?

Authors:  D W Schultz; C W Eriksen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-01

3.  On the nature of input channels in visual processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Bjork; J Thomas Murray
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Evidence for an interruption theory of backward masking.

Authors:  T J Spencer; R Shuntich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-08

5.  Studies of letter identification using qualitative error analysis: effects of speed stress, tachistoscopic presentation, and word context.

Authors:  K E Stanovich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Transient stimulation does not aid visual search: implications for the role of saccades.

Authors:  E Kowler; G Sperling
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-01

7.  Interference in letter identification: a test of feature-specific inhibition.

Authors:  J L Santee; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-04

8.  Asymmetry of visual interference.

Authors:  W P Banks; D W Larson; W Prinzmetal
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-06

9.  Letter identification as a function of type of perceptual limitation and type of attribute.

Authors:  W R Garner; F Haun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Independence of successive inputs and uncorrelated error in visual form perception.

Authors:  C W Eriksen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-07
View more
  10 in total

1.  How important is lateral masking in visual search?

Authors:  A H Wertheim; I T C Hooge; K Krikke; A Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Feature sensitivity, bias, and interdependencies as a function of energy and payoffs.

Authors:  J T Townsend; G G Hu; H Kadlec
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-06

3.  Redundant-target detection and processing capacity: the problem of positional preferences.

Authors:  P A Mullin; H E Egeth; J T Mordkoff
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-06

4.  Task and contrast effects on performance with parafoval stimulus pairs.

Authors:  G Chastain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1983

5.  Parallel processing of redundant targets in simple visual search tasks.

Authors:  A H van der Heijden; W La Heij; J P Boer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1983

6.  Contour interaction as a function of retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  G Wolford; L Chambers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-11

7.  Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task.

Authors:  L Harms; C Bundesen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-01

8.  Lateral masking as a function of spacing.

Authors:  G Wolford; L Chambers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

9.  Misaligned and Polarity-Reversed Faces Determine Face-specific Capacity Limits.

Authors:  Volker Thoma; Neil Ward; Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-27

10.  The impact of distractor congruency on stimulus processing in retinotopic visual cortex.

Authors:  Todd A Kelley; Geraint Rees; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.