Literature DB >> 508145

Brainstem auditory-evoked responses. Normal variation as a function of stimulus and subject characteristics.

J E Stockard, J J Stockard, B F Westmoreland, J L Corfits.   

Abstract

Brainstem auditory-evoked responses (BAERs) were elicited from 64 neurologically and audiometrically normal adults and 77 normal, full-term neonates with broadband rarefaction or condensation clicks at sensation levels (hearing levels in neonates) of 30 to 70 dB and at rates of ten and 80 clicks per second. In addition to the known effects of rate, previously unrecognized effects of acoustic phase and stimulus intensity on BAER interpeak latencies (IPLs), and an interaction of all three stimulus parameters, were found. Stimulus characteristics, age, and sex can account for much of the inter- and intrasubject variability of BAER IPLs and morphology. The BAER effects of many of these variables and their interactions have not been appreciated in clinical applications of BAER. Recognition and control of such reducible, methodological sources of BAER variability will enhance the sensitivity and specificity of the test in neurologic diagnosis.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 508145     DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1979.00500490037006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Neurol        ISSN: 0003-9942


  24 in total

1.  Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  Nathan P Buerkle; Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.320

2.  A new dimension of sensory dysfunction: stereopsis deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Isaac Schechter; Pamela D Butler; Maria Jalbrzikowski; Roey Pasternak; Alice M Saperstein; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Differences by sex, ear, and sexual orientation in the time intervals between successive peaks in auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Michelle D Hsieh; Adrian Garcia-Sierra; Craig A Champlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Electrophysiological markers of cochlear function correlate with hearing-in-noise performance among audiometrically normal subjects.

Authors:  Kelsie J Grant; Anita M Mepani; Peizhe Wu; Kenneth E Hancock; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A survey of current techniques in veterinary electrodiagnostics: EEG, spinal evoked and brainstem auditory evoked potential recording.

Authors:  J E Steiss
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.459

6.  Age, sex and mental retardation related changes of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in Down's syndrome.

Authors:  R Ferri; S Del Gracco; M Elia; S A Musumeci; M C Stefanini
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1995-09

Review 7.  Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and its perceptual consequences.

Authors:  Gary Rance
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

Review 8.  Multimodality evoked responses in the neurological assessment of the newborn.

Authors:  E Mercuri; K von Siebenthal; H Daniëls; F Guzzetta; P Casaer
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Extraction of the constituent components of brain stem auditory evoked responses by a filtering and optimisation procedure.

Authors:  J G Thomas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Jennifer Krizman; Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.