Literature DB >> 3195044

A survey of current techniques in veterinary electrodiagnostics: EEG, spinal evoked and brainstem auditory evoked potential recording.

J E Steiss1.   

Abstract

A questionnaire on the techniques being used to record electroencephalograms, spinal evoked potentials and brainstem auditory evoked potentials was mailed to 34 neurologists at veterinary colleges and board certified veterinary neurologists in private practice in the United States and Canada. Nineteen replies (56%) were returned. A summary of the questionnaire is provided, which indicates the diversity of electrodiagnostic techniques currently used.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3195044     DOI: 10.1007/bf00343246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res Commun        ISSN: 0165-7380            Impact factor:   2.459


  33 in total

1.  Far-field acoustic response: origins in the cat.

Authors:  J S Buchwald; C Huang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Electroencephalography with barbiturate anesthesia in the dog.

Authors:  E Tonuma
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Effect of chlorpromazine combined with intermittent light stimulation on the electroencephalogram and clinical response of the Beagle dog.

Authors:  H C Redman; G L Wilson; J E Hogan
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.156

4.  Current status and trends in veterinary electroencephalography.

Authors:  W R Klemm; C L Hall
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1974-03-01       Impact factor: 1.936

Review 5.  Postnatal development of the EEG in the dog. I. Introduction and EEG techniques.

Authors:  M W Fox
Journal:  J Small Anim Pract       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 1.522

6.  American Electroencephalographic Society. Guidelines for clinical evoked potential studies.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.177

7.  Effects of fentanyl citrate and droperidol on electroencephalographic findings in dogs.

Authors:  A E Katherman; C D Knecht; R W Redding
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 1.156

8.  Reference values of the brainstem auditory evoked response of methoxyflurane anesthetized and unanesthetized dogs.

Authors:  L J Myers; R W Redding; S Wilson
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.459

9.  Brain stem auditory-evoked response of the nonanesthetized dog.

Authors:  A E Marshall
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 1.156

10.  Auditory brain stem response testing in anesthetized horses.

Authors:  S L Rolf; S M Reed; W Melnick; F M Andrews
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 1.156

View more
  4 in total

1.  Abnormalities in Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials in Sheep with Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies and Lack of a Clear Pathological Relationship.

Authors:  Timm Konold; Laura J Phelan; Saira Cawthraw; Marion M Simmons; Melanie J Chaplin; Lorenzo González
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-08-02

2.  Diagnostic Utility of Wireless Video-Electroencephalography in Unsedated Dogs.

Authors:  F M K James; M A Cortez; G Monteith; T S Jokinen; S Sanders; F Wielaender; A Fischer; H Lohi
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Effect of prior general anesthesia or sedation and antiseizure drugs on the diagnostic utility of wireless video electroencephalography in dogs.

Authors:  Thomas Parmentier; Gabrielle Monteith; Miguel A Cortez; Franziska Wielaender; Andrea Fischer; Tarja S Jokinen; Hannes Lohi; Sean Sanders; Veronique Sammut; Tricia Tai; Fiona M K James
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Reliability of fNIRS for noninvasive monitoring of brain function and emotion in sheep.

Authors:  Matteo Chincarini; Emanuela Dalla Costa; Lina Qiu; Lorenzo Spinelli; Simona Cannas; Clara Palestrini; Elisabetta Canali; Michela Minero; Bruno Cozzi; Nicola Ferri; Daniele Ancora; Francesco De Pasquale; Giorgio Vignola; Alessandro Torricelli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.