Literature DB >> 493998

Parabolic flight: loss of sense of orientation.

J R Lackner, A Graybiel.   

Abstract

On the earth, or in level flight, a blindfolded subject being rotated at constant velocity about his recumbent long body axis experiences illusory orbital motion of his body in the opposite direction. By contrast, during comparable rotation in the free-fall phase of parabolic flight, no body motion is perceived and all sense of external orientation may be lost; when touch and pressure stimulation is applied to the body surface, a sense of orientation is reestablished immediately. The increased gravitoinertial force period of a parabola produces an exaggeration of the orbital motion experienced in level flight. These observations reveal an important influence of touch, pressure, and kinesthetic information on spatial orientation and provide a basis for understanding many of the postural illusions reported by astronauts in space flight.

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 493998     DOI: 10.1126/science.493998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  8 in total

1.  Mechanisms of human static spatial orientation.

Authors:  S B Bortolami; S Rocca; S Daros; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Subjective somatosensory vertical during dynamic tilt is dependent on task, inertial condition, and multisensory concordance.

Authors:  W G Wright; S Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Influence of gravitoinertial force level on the subjective vertical during recumbent yaw axis body tilt.

Authors:  A S Bryan; S B Bortolami; J Ventura; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motion perceptions induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt.

Authors:  P Denise; C Darlot; J Droulez; B Cohen; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Compensatory manual motor responses while object wielding during combined linear visual and physical roll tilt stimulation.

Authors:  W Geoffrey Wright; Erich Schneider; Stefan Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  The Importance of Being in Touch.

Authors:  James R Lackner
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Dry immersion as a model of deafferentation: A neurophysiology study using somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Blandine Acket; Liubov Amirova; Angelique Gerdelat; Pascal Cintas; Marc-Antoine Custaud; Anne Pavy-LeTraon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Challenges to the Vestibular System in Space: How the Brain Responds and Adapts to Microgravity.

Authors:  Jérome Carriot; Isabelle Mackrous; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.492

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.