Literature DB >> 490787

Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer.

M J Hicks, J R Davis, J M Layton, A J Present.   

Abstract

Mammography and physical examination of the breast are evaluated as screening instruments for detecting breast cancer based on local biopsy data obtained from women enrolled in a national breast cancer screening program. One hundren thirteen cancers (15.5%) of women who underwent biopsy) were detected. The individual sensitivities of mammography and physical examination for detecting breast cancer are 62% and 24%, respectively. The sensitivity of the two methods combined is 75% (85 of 113). Thirty-seven cancers were in situ or minimally invasive (less than or equal to 1 cm in greatest dimension). Eighty-one percent (30 of 37) of these small cancers were detected by screening, and they comprised 35% (30 of 85) of all cancers detected by mammography, physical examination, or both. Improved survival is anticipated due to this high rate of discovery of small cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 490787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  6 in total

1.  Lump detection is enhanced in silicone breast models simulating postmenopausal breast tissue.

Authors:  M M McDermott; N C Dolan; J Huang; D Reifler; A W Rademaker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Screening for breast cancer: current attitudes and practice.

Authors:  E J Noulty
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Mammography in screening for breast cancer: a viewpoint.

Authors:  M Dworkind; S Greenberg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Physical diagnosis versus modern technology. A review.

Authors:  F T Fitzgerald
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-04

5.  The role of the obstetrician-gynecologist in the management of breast lesions.

Authors:  L R Weekes
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Estimating the sensitivity of breast cancer screening--experience with the Honolulu BCDDP data.

Authors:  J S Grove; M J Goodman; F I Gilbert; G Low
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.872

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.