Literature DB >> 2190412

Physical diagnosis versus modern technology. A review.

F T Fitzgerald1.   

Abstract

The role of physical diagnosis in an age of modern diagnostic technology has been evaluated by investigators assessing specific techniques in a number of areas, though there has been no systematic comprehensive study of the sensitivity, specificity, cost-benefit ratio, and reliability of physical diagnosis relative to technologic diagnostic tools. In a review of published studies comparing physical with nonphysical diagnostic techniques, the startling accuracy of physical diagnosticians in some areas contrasts sharply with the extremely poor correlation of physical findings with autopsy or imaging studies in others. In a time of constricting financial resources, physicians-and those who teach or judge physicians' skills-must begin to compare physical and nonphysical diagnostic techniques rigorously so that the best, safest, and least expensive diagnostic test is chosen in each clinical situation.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2190412      PMCID: PMC1002356     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  112 in total

Review 1.  The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (first of two parts).

Authors:  L M Koran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Sinusitis of the maxillary antrum.

Authors:  F O Evans; J B Sydnor; W E Moore; G R Moore; J L Manwaring; A H Brill; R T Jackson; S Hanna; J S Skaar; L V Holdeman; S Fitz-Hugh; M A Sande; J M Gwaltney
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-10-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients.

Authors:  J R Hampton; M J Harrison; J R Mitchell; J S Prichard; C Seymour
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-05-31

4.  Correlation of liver and spleen size. Determinations by nuclear medicine studies and physical examination.

Authors:  S Halpern; M Coel; W Ashburn; N Alazraki; R Littenberg; S Hurwitz; J Green
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1974-07

5.  Sphygmomanometric cuff size and blood pressure recordings.

Authors:  G E Burch; L Shewey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1973-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Acute bronchial asthma. Relations between clinical and physiologic manifestations.

Authors:  E R McFadden; R Kiser; W J DeGroot
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-02-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Angiography in the management of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. Its value and safety.

Authors:  D C Brewster; A Retana; A C Waltman; R C Darling
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Abdominal bruits. Clinical and angiographic correlation.

Authors:  M J McLoughlin; R J Colapinto; B B Hobbs
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1975-06-23       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Routine blood cultures from febrile outpatients. Use in detecting bacteremia.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg; J D Rose; A J Weinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Unsuspected substantial pericardial effusions detected by echocardiography.

Authors:  A L Riba; J Morganroth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-12-06       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  8 in total

1.  Reliability of clinical examinations for pediatric skin and soft-tissue infections.

Authors:  Jennifer R Marin; Warren Bilker; Ebbing Lautenbach; Elizabeth R Alpern
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Physical diagnosis and the nonexpert physician.

Authors:  B W Spurlock
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-07

Review 3.  Physical examination education in graduate medical education--a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Somnath Mookherjee; Lara Pheatt; Sumant R Ranji; Calvin L Chou
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Patient's perceptions of physical examination in the setting of chronic pain.

Authors:  Mohamed M Hashim; Deirdre M Edgeworth; Jean A Saunders; Dominic C Harmon
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Internal medicine patients' expectations for care during office visits.

Authors:  R L Kravitz; D W Cope; V Bhrany; B Leake
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Physician performance and patient perceptions during the rectal examination.

Authors:  T J Wilt; A F Cutler
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Cancer patients' perceptions regarding the value of the physical examination: a survey study.

Authors:  Kunal C Kadakia; David Hui; Gary B Chisholm; Susan E Frisbee-Hume; Janet L Williams; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Bedside teaching in medical education: a literature review.

Authors:  Max Peters; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2014-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.