Literature DB >> 21249022

Screening for breast cancer: current attitudes and practice.

E J Noulty.   

Abstract

In a survey of selected Ontario physicians, 21% reported following the suggestion of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination that all women 50 to 59 years of age have annual mammographic and physical examination of the breast. Concern about screening continues to centre on the issue of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mammography. In comparison to previous studies, fewer physicians report concern about radiation risk. The only characteristic distinguishing between physicians who report regularly screening for breast cancer and those who do not is their agreement with the Task Force suggestion.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 21249022      PMCID: PMC2280843     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  20 in total

1.  Risk benefit in mass screening programs for breast cancer.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  UICC project on screening for cancer: report of the workshop on screening for breast cancer. Meeting held in Helsinki, Finland, on April 7-9, 1986.

Authors:  N E Day; C J Baines; J Chamberlain; M Hakama; A B Miller; P Prorok
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1986-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a preliminary report from five centers.

Authors:  C J Baines; A B Miller; C Wall; D V McFarlane; I S Simor; R Jong; B J Shapiro; L Audet; M Petitclerc; D Ouimet-Oliva
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981.

Authors:  A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac; F Sturmans; N E Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report.

Authors:  L H Baker
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Family physicians' beliefs about breast cancer screening by mammography.

Authors:  K M Cummings; D P Funch; C Mettlin; E Jennings
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Patterns of preventive practice in New Brunswick.

Authors:  R N Battista; C S Palmer; B M Marchand; W O Spitzer
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Screening mammography: referral practices of Los Angeles physicians.

Authors:  L W Bassett; D H Bunnell; J A Cerny; R H Gold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Are we on the brink of a major transformation of clinical method?

Authors:  I R McWhinney
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  2 in total

1.  Nurturing research in a family medicine department.

Authors:  G Deagle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Breast cancer screening for women younger than 40.

Authors:  A F Gili; Z Poonja; B B Kalra
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.275

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.