Literature DB >> 20054952

Contrast-enhanced MRI versus myelography and contrast-enhanced CT in postdiskectomy problems.

M Annertz1, G Hägglund, S Holtås, B Jönsson, B Strömqvist.   

Abstract

The differentiation between scar tissue and disk herniation is essential in postdiskectomy problems of the lumbar spine, since reoperation on scar tissue alone is often unfavourable. Epidural scar is a vascularized tissue, and enhancement can be seen after intravenous contrast injection, allowing differentiation from avascular disk material. Ten patients who had previously undergone surgery for lumbar disk herniation and with recurrent symptoms severe enough to warrant repeat surgery were examined by myelography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) before reoperation. MRI was performed with T1- and T2-weighted sequences in sagittal and axial projections before and after intravenous contrast injection. CT scans were obtained before and during intravenous contrast infusion. Reoperation revealed scar tissue, alone or together with disk, in 9 of 10 patients. Enhancement of scar but not of disk material was observed on MRI in 8 cases, but in none on CT. No enhancement of disk was seen with either modality. The correct diagnosis was given by MRI in 9 of 10 patients and by CT in 3 of 10. CT was superior to MRI in only 1 patient, who had a bony stenosis. Myelography could not separate disk from scar in any case. In conclusion, contrast-enhanced MRI was superior to MRI without contrast, CT before and after contrast, as well as myelography in discriminating disk from scar tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 20054952     DOI: 10.1007/bf00300932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  14 in total

1.  Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumbar spine: time course and mechanism of enhancement.

Authors:  J S Ross; R Delamarter; M G Hueftle; T J Masaryk; M Aikawa; J Carter; C VanDyke; M T Modic
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  High-resolution MR imaging of sequestered lumbar intervertebral disks.

Authors:  T J Masaryk; J S Ross; M T Modic; F Boumphrey; H Bohlman; G Wilber
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  CT of the postoperative lumbar spine: the value of intravenous contrast.

Authors:  T Weiss; J Treisch; E Kazner; D Köhler; H Collmann; C Claussen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Lumbar spine after surgery: examination with intravenous contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  H Firooznia; I I Kricheff; M Rafii; C Golimbu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Recurrent postoperative sciatica: evaluation with MR imaging and enhanced CT.

Authors:  L Frocrain; R Duvauferrier; J L Husson; J Noël; A Ramée; Y Pawlotsky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Gd-DOTA: characterization of a new paramagnetic complex.

Authors:  J C Bousquet; S Saini; D D Stark; P F Hahn; M Nigam; J Wittenberg; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Review. Computed tomography of the postoperative lumbar spine.

Authors:  J G Teplick; M E Haskin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Distinguishing between scar and recurrent herniated disk in postoperative patients: value of contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging.

Authors:  C V Bundschuh; L Stein; J H Slusser; F P Schinco; L E Ladaga; J D Dillon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Results of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply-operated back patient. Analysis of sixty-seven cases followed for three to seven years.

Authors:  W J Finnegan; J M Fenlin; J P Marvel; R J Nardini; R H Rothman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Differential diagnosis of recurrent lumbar disc herniation and postoperative deformation by myelography. An impossible task.

Authors:  L Irstam
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Re-exploration of the lumbar spine following simple discectomy: a review of 23 cases.

Authors:  T Shiraishi; H V Crock
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Serial MRI in the early postoperative period after lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  M Annertz; B Jönsson; B Strömqvist; S Holtås
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Evaluation of diagnosis techniques used for spinal injury related back pain.

Authors:  Meaghan Janssen; Aliaa Nabih; Walied Moussa; Gregory N Kawchuk; Jason P Carey
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-06-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.