Literature DB >> 4692674

Use of 4 per cent chlorhexidine detergent solution (Hibiscrub) and other methods of skin disinfection.

E J Lowbury, H A Lilly.   

Abstract

In a comparison of three antiseptic detergent preparations for hand washing, Hibiscrub, a 4% chlorhexidine detergent solution, caused a significantly greater estimated immediate reduction of skin flora (86.7% +/- 3.0) than was obtained with Dermofax, a 0.75% chlorhexidine detergent solution (55.5% +/- 5.1), or with Disadine scrub, a povidone iodine detergent preparation (68% +/- 6.8). After six applications the mean estimated reductions of skin flora were 99.2% +/- 0.2 for Hibiscrub, 97.7% +/- 0.7 for povidone iodine, and 91.8% +/- 1.6 for Dermofax.After a series of hand washings with Hibiscrub, as with a hexachlorophane detergent preparation, a further large reduction of skin flora, shown by bacterial counts of hand sampling, was obtained by a second phase of disinfection consisting of two minutes' application on gauze swabs of 0.5% chlorhexidine digluconate in 70% ethanol; a further wash with Hibiscrub, in place of alcoholic chlorhexidine, for the second phase of disinfection caused an increase rather than a reduction in the yield of bacteria on skin sampling. Unlike this "two-phase" disinfection, the application for 30 minutes of compresses soaked in 10% aqueous povidone iodine or in 0.5% aqueous chlorhexidine digluconate did not cause a greater reduction in skin flora than that obtained by the conventional two minutes' application on gauze of 0.5% chlorhexidine in 70% ethanol.Chlorocresol (0.3%) liquid soap (the base used for Ster-Zac liquid hexachlorophane soap) caused a mean reduction of skin flora when used for hand washing of 29% after one application and 72% after six applications spread over two days. This formulation, though less active and more variable as a detergent skin antiseptic than chlorhexidine, hexachlorophane, or povidone iodine detergent preparations, is an inexpensive disinfectant soap which could be useful in catering establishments. Alcoholic cetrimide applied as for disinfection of an operation site caused a reduction of skin flora greater than that shown by aqueous cetrimide but comparable to that shown by 70% ethyl alcohol in previous experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1973        PMID: 4692674      PMCID: PMC1588678          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.5852.510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  9 in total

1.  DISINFECTION OF HANDS: REMOVAL OF TRANSIENT ORGANISMS.

Authors:  E J LOWBURY; H A LILLY; J P BULL
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1964-07-25

2.  METHODS FOR DISINFECTION OF HANDS AND OPERATION SITES.

Authors:  E J LOWBURY; H A LILLY; J P BULL
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1964-08-29

3.  Disinfection of the skin of operation sites.

Authors:  E J LOWBURY; H A LILLY; J P BULL
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1960-10-08

4.  Disinfection of the hands of surgeons and nurses.

Authors:  E J LOWBURY; H A LILLY
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1960-05-14

5.  Testing of skin disinfectants.

Authors:  P STORY
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1952-11-22

6.  Skin distribution of Clostridium welchii: use of iodophor as sporicidal agent.

Authors:  S E Drewett; W Tuke; D J Payne; P E Verdon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Dermal absorption of hexochlorophane in infants.

Authors:  A Curley; R D Kimbrough; R E Hawk; G Nathenson; L Finberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-08-07       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Effect of hexachlorophane on incidence of staphylococcal and gram-negative infection in the newborn.

Authors:  J O Forfar; J C Gould; A F Maccabe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1968-07-27       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Disinfection of the skin: an assessment of some new preparations.

Authors:  H A Lilly; E J Lowbury
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-09-18
  9 in total
  33 in total

1.  Letter: Hibiscrub in acne.

Authors:  S A Khan
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-11-08

2.  A quick and effective method of limb preparation with health, safety and efficiency benefits.

Authors:  N Naderi; K Maw; M Thomas; D E Boyce; K Shokrollahi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Reducing surgical site infections: a review.

Authors:  David E Reichman; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

4.  Anaerobic and aerobic skin bacteria before and after skin-disinfection with chlorhexidine: an experimental study in volunteers.

Authors:  M L Nielsen; D Raahave; J G Stage; T Justesen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Antimicrobial Resistance to Agents Used for Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization: Is There a Reason for Concern?

Authors:  Gregory R Madden; Costi D Sifri
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Impact of newborn skin-cleansing with chlorhexidine on neonatal mortality in southern Nepal: a community-based, cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  James M Tielsch; Gary L Darmstadt; Luke C Mullany; Subarna K Khatry; Joanne Katz; Steven C LeClerq; Shardaram Shrestha; Ramesh Adhikari
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Transient skin flora: their removal by cleansing or disinfection in relation to their mode of deposition.

Authors:  H A Lilly; E J Lowbury
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Comparative study on the antimicrobial effect of 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol on the normal flora of hands.

Authors:  R Aly; H I Maibach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Detergents compared with each other and with antiseptics as skin 'degerming' agents.

Authors:  H A Lilly; E J Lowbury; M D Wilkins
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1979-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.