Literature DB >> 453833

Comparative study on the antimicrobial effect of 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol on the normal flora of hands.

R Aly, H I Maibach.   

Abstract

A gloved-hand wash method was used to compare the antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine gluconate alcohol emollient hand wash (HIBISTAT) with that of 70% isopropyl alcohol on the normal flora of the hands (81 subjects) under conditions designed to mimic use by surgeons. Results of the immediate postwash effects on the bacterial counts for all 3 tests days showed that chlorhexidine significantly reduced the normal flora of the hands. When compared with the base line bacterial counts, there was 85, 96, and 98% reduction with chlorhexidine treatment and 84, 93, and 90% reduction with alcohol treatment on days 1,2, and 5, respectively. The difference between chlorhexidine and alcohol treatments was not statistically significant on days 1 and 2, but was significant on day 5 (P less than 0.01). For delayed postwash bacterial counts (for persistent antimicrobial effects), the overall log means were 4.9943 and 5.4684 for chlorhexidine and alcohol treatments, respectively. The difference between the two treatments was significant (P less than 0.01). After the chlorhexidien treatment, there was no significant growth of bacteria over a period of 6 h when compared with the base line bacterial counts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 453833      PMCID: PMC243263          DOI: 10.1128/aem.37.3.610-613.1979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  10 in total

1.  METHODS FOR DISINFECTION OF HANDS AND OPERATION SITES.

Authors:  E J LOWBURY; H A LILLY; J P BULL
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1964-08-29

2.  SOME ASPECTS OF THE MODE OF ACTION OF CHLORHEXIDINE.

Authors:  W B HUGO; A R LONGWORTH
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 3.765

3.  The use of chlorhexidine.

Authors:  H BEEUWKES
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1958       Impact factor: 2.271

4.  Disinfection of the skin of operation sites.

Authors:  E J LOWBURY; H A LILLY; J P BULL
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1960-10-08

5.  Disinfection of the hands of surgeons and nurses.

Authors:  E J LOWBURY; H A LILLY
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1960-05-14

6.  Chemical fractionation of phosphorus-32 labelled cells of Micrococcus lysodeikticus treated with chlorhexidine.

Authors:  R M Rye; D Wiseman
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 3.765

7.  The effect of chlorhexidine on the electrophoretic mobility, cytoplasmic constituents, dehydrogenase activity and cell walls of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  W B Hugo; A R Longworth
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 3.765

8.  Comparison of the action of vantocil, cetrimide and chlorhexidine on Escherichia coli and its spheroplasts and the protoplasts of gram positive bacteria.

Authors:  A Davies; M Bentley; B S Field
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1968-12

9.  Use of 4 per cent chlorhexidine detergent solution (Hibiscrub) and other methods of skin disinfection.

Authors:  E J Lowbury; H A Lilly
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-03-03

10.  Comparative evaluation of surgical scrub preparations.

Authors:  A F Peterson; A Rosenberg; S D Alatary
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1978-01
  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified Reactive Delphi procedure. Part 2: methodology, analysis and results.

Authors:  Connie L Harris; Samantha Holloway
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified reactive Delphi procedure. Part one: the literature review*.

Authors:  Connie L Harris; Samantha Holloway
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Comparative evaluation of the immediate and sustained antibacterial action of two regimens, based on triclosan- and chlorhexidine-containing handwash preparations, on volunteers.

Authors:  C A Bartzokas; J E Corkill; T Makin; E Parry
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 4.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Standardized method for evaluation of hand disinfection by surgical scrub formulations.

Authors:  A Crémieux; M E Reverdy; J L Pons; C Savage; J Chevalier; J Fleurette; M Mossé
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Hand washing rituals in trauma theatre: clean or dirty?

Authors:  L Hajipour; L Longstaff; V Cleeve; N Brewster; D Bint; P Henman
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Comparative antimicrobial activity, in vitro and in vivo, of soft N-chloramine systems and chlorhexidine.

Authors:  S H Selk; S A Pogány; T Higuchi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparative efficacy of hand hygiene agents in the reduction of bacteria and viruses.

Authors:  Emily E Sickbert-Bennett; David J Weber; Maria F Gergen-Teague; Mark D Sobsey; Gregory P Samsa; William A Rutala
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.918

9.  Appropriate time-interval application of alcohol hand gel on reducing influenza-like illness among preschool children: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Denla Pandejpong; Somwang Danchaivijitr; Nirun Vanprapa; Temyos Pandejpong; Earl Francis Cook
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.918

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.