Literature DB >> 4591175

Alloantiserum-induced inhibition of immune response gene product function. II. Genetic analysis of target antigens.

E M Shevach, I Green, W E Paul.   

Abstract

It has been previously demonstrated that alloantisera can specifically block the activation of T lymphocytes by antigens, the response to which is linked to the presence of histocompatibility (H) types against which the alloantisera are directed. Thus, strain 13 anti-2 serum can inhibit the activation of (2 x 13)F(1) T lymphocytes by a DNP derivative of a copolymer of L-glutamic acid and L-lysine (DNP-GL), an antigen the response to which is controlled by a 2-linked Ir gene. It was proposed that alloantisera can inhibit T-lymphocyte antigen recognition through interference with the activity of immune response (Ir) gene products. In order to further study whether the inhibitory antibodies within the alloantisera are directed against H antigens or against the products of the Ir genes, we have examined whether the anti-2 serum can inhibit the function of an Ir gene (the L-glutamic acid and L-alanine [GA] gene), which is normally linked to strain 2 H genes when this gene occurs in an outbred animal lacking strain 2 H genes. In the majority of cases, the anti-2 serum was capable of inhibiting the in vitro proliferative response to GA of T cells derived from animals that were GA(+)2(+), but the serum had little if any effect on the GA response of T cells from GA(+)2(-) animals. Furthermore, an antiserum prepared in strain 13 animals against the lymphoid cells of a GA(+)2(-) outbred animal was devoid of inhibitory activity on the GA response of cells from a (2 x 13)F(1), while an antiserum prepared in strain 13 animals against the lymphoid cells of a GA(+)2(+) outbred animal was capable of specifically inhibiting the response to GA. It thus appears that the inhibition of the GA response by the anti-2 serum is primarily mediated via antibodies directed toward strain 2 H antigens rather than antibodies specific for the product of the GA Ir gene. The mechanism of alloantiserum induced suppression of Ir gene function would then be by steric interference with the Ir gene product on the cell surface, rather than by direct binding to it. This conclusion implies that the products of both the H genes and the Ir genes are physically related on the cell surface. The implications of such a relationship in terms of the fluid-mosaic model of the lymphocyte surface are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4591175      PMCID: PMC2139552          DOI: 10.1084/jem.139.3.679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


  16 in total

1.  Antibody-induced redistribution of HL-A antigens at the cell surface.

Authors:  F M Kourilsky; D Silvestre; C Neauport-Sautes; Y Loosfelt; J Dausset
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Lymphocyte activation. 3. Binding sites for phytomitogens on lymphocyte subpopulations.

Authors:  M F Greaves; S Bauminger; G Janossy
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Histocompatibility type and immune responsiveness in random bred Hartley strain guinea pigs.

Authors:  W J Martin; L Ellman; I Green; B Benacerraf
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1970-12-01       Impact factor: 14.307

4.  Histocompatibility-linked immune response gene function in guinea pigs. Specific inhibition of antigen-induced lymphocyte proliferation by alloantisera.

Authors:  E M Shevach; W E Paul; I Green
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1972-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  Linkage between the poly-L-lysine gene and the locus controlling the major histocompatibility antigens in strain 2 guinea pigs.

Authors:  L Ellman; I Green; W J Martin; B Benacerraf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes.

Authors:  S J Singer; G L Nicolson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Specific immune response genes of the guinea pig. I. Dominant genetic control of immune responsiveness to copolymers of L-glutamic acid and L-alanine and L-glutamic acid and L-tyrosine.

Authors:  H G Bluestein; I Green; B Benacerraf
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1971-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  The peritoneal exudate lymphocyte. I. Differences in antigen responsiveness between peritoneal exudate and lymph node lymphocytes from immunized guinea pigs.

Authors:  D L Rosenstreich; J T Blake; A S Rosenthal
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1971-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Specific immune response genes of the guinea pig. 3. Linkage of the GA and GT immune response genes to histocompatibility genotypes in inbred guinea pigs.

Authors:  H G Bluestein; L Ellman; I Green; B Benacerraf
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1971-12-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Specific immune response genes of the guinea pig. II. Relationship between the poly-L-lysine gene and the genes controlling immune responsiveness to copolymers of L-glutamic acid and L-alanine and L-glutamic acid and L-tyrosine in random-bred Hartley guinea pigs.

Authors:  H G Bluestein; I Green; B Benacerraf
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1971-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  13 in total

1.  Thymus-derived rat lymphocyte receptor for cell surface antigens is a nonserologically defined product of the major histocompatibility gene complex.

Authors:  H Wekerle; Z Eshhar; P Lonai; M Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Uncovering the role of invariant chain in controlling MHC class II antigen capture.

Authors:  Ronald N Germain
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Selective loss of antigen-specific Ir gene function in IA mutant B6.C-H-2bm12 is an antigen presenting cell defect.

Authors:  C C Lin; A S Rosenthal; H C Passmore; T H Hansen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Guinea pig immune response-related histocompatibility antigens. Partial characterization and distribution.

Authors:  F D Findelman; E M Shevach; E S Vitetta; I Green; W E Paul
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1975-01-01       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  In vivo effects of antibodies to immune response gene products. I. Haplotype-specific suppression of humoral immune responses with a monoclonal anti-I-A.

Authors:  J T Rosenbaum; N E Adelman; H O McDevitt
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1981-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  Antigen-specific T-cell factor in cell cooperation: physical properties and mapping in the left-hand (K) half of H-2.

Authors:  A J Munro; M J Taussig; R Campbell; H Williams; Y Lawson
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1974-12-01       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  Shared idiotypic determinants on B and T lymphocytes reactive against the same antigenic determinants. II. Determination of frequency and characteristics of idiotypic T and B lymphocytes in normal rats using direct visualization.

Authors:  H Binz; H Wigzell
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1975-11-01       Impact factor: 14.307

Review 8.  T cells and their eons-old obsession with MHC.

Authors:  Lei Yin; James Scott-Browne; John W Kappler; Laurent Gapin; Philippa Marrack
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 12.988

9.  Alloantiserum-mediated suppression of histocompatibility-linked Ir-gene-controlled immune responses. Suppressive effects of IgG fragments derived from alloantisera.

Authors:  H G Bluestein
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1974-08-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Structural characteristics of the alloantigens determined by the major histocompatibility complex of the guinea pig.

Authors:  B D Schwartz; A M Kask; W E Paul; E M Shevach
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1976-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.