Literature DB >> 17202232

BOLD coherence reveals segregated functional neural interactions when adapting to distinct torque perturbations.

Eugene Tunik1, Paul J Schmitt, Scott T Grafton.   

Abstract

In the natural world, we experience and adapt to multiple extrinsic perturbations. This poses a challenge to neural circuits in discriminating between different context-appropriate responses. Using event-related fMRI, we characterized the neural dynamics involved in this process by randomly delivering a position- or velocity-dependent torque perturbation to subjects' arms during a target-capture task. Each perturbation was color-cued during movement preparation to provide contextual information. Although trajectories differed between perturbations, subjects significantly reduced error under both conditions. This was paralleled by reduced BOLD signal in the right dentate nucleus, the left sensorimotor cortex, and the left intraparietal sulcus. Trials included "NoGo" conditions to dissociate activity related to preparation from execution and adaptation. Subsequent analysis identified perturbation-specific neural processes underlying preparation ("NoGo") and adaptation ("Go") early and late into learning. Between-perturbation comparisons of BOLD magnitude revealed negligible differences for both preparation and adaptation trials. However, a network-level analysis of BOLD coherence revealed that by late learning, response preparation ("NoGo") was attributed to a relative focusing of coherence within cortical and basal ganglia networks in both perturbation conditions, demonstrating a common network interaction for establishing arbitrary visuomotor associations. Conversely, late-learning adaptation ("Go") was attributed to a focusing of BOLD coherence between a cortical-basal ganglia network in the viscous condition and between a cortical-cerebellar network in the positional condition. Our findings demonstrate that trial-to-trial acquisition of two distinct adaptive responses is attributed not to anatomically segregated regions, but to differential functional interactions within common sensorimotor circuits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17202232      PMCID: PMC1945221          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00405.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  66 in total

1.  A PET study of visuomotor learning under optical rotation.

Authors:  K Inoue; R Kawashima; K Satoh; S Kinomura; M Sugiura; R Goto; M Ito; H Fukuda
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Patterns of regional brain activation associated with different forms of motor learning.

Authors:  M Ghilardi; C Ghez; V Dhawan; J Moeller; M Mentis; T Nakamura; A Antonini; D Eidelberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Differential involvement of parietal and precentral regions in movement preparation and motor intention.

Authors:  Daniel Thoenissen; Karl Zilles; Ivan Toni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Systematic changes in motor cortex cell activity with arm posture during directional isometric force generation.

Authors:  Lauren E Sergio; John F Kalaska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Subthalamic nucleus and internal globus pallidus scale with the rate of change of force production in humans.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Mary A Mayka; Keith R Thulborn; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Measuring interregional functional connectivity using coherence and partial coherence analyses of fMRI data.

Authors:  Felice T Sun; Lee M Miller; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Impedance control and internal model use during the initial stage of adaptation to novel dynamics in humans.

Authors:  Theodore E Milner; David W Franklin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus, and cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Clower; R A West; J C Lynch; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The primate subthalamic nucleus. III. Changes in motor behavior and neuronal activity in the internal pallidum induced by subthalamic inactivation in the MPTP model of parkinsonism.

Authors:  T Wichmann; H Bergman; M R DeLong
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  14 in total

1.  The extrinsic and intrinsic functional architectures of the human brain are not equivalent.

Authors:  Maarten Mennes; Clare Kelly; Stan Colcombe; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Human basal ganglia and the dynamic control of force during on-line corrections.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural substrates of visuomotor learning based on improved feedback control and prediction.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton; Paul Schmitt; John Van Horn; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Subcortical processes of motor response inhibition during a stop signal task.

Authors:  Chiang-Shan Ray Li; Peisi Yan; Rajita Sinha; Tien-Wen Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Functional imaging of the deep cerebellar nuclei: a review.

Authors:  Christophe Habas
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of online motor correction processing revealed by high-density electroencephalography.

Authors:  Laura Dipietro; Howard Poizner; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Neural correlates of adaptation to gradual and to sudden visuomotor distortions in humans.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Christoph F Schorn; Otmar Bock; Nina Theysohn; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dissociating the contributions of independent corticostriatal systems to visual categorization learning through the use of reinforcement learning modeling and Granger causality modeling.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson; Corinna M Cincotta; Dan Lopez-Paniagua; Charles W Anderson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.