Literature DB >> 444661

Improved survival of increased-risk myeloma patients on combined triple-alkylating-agent therapy: a study of the CALGB.

J B Harley, T F Pajak, O R McIntyre, S Kochwa, M R Cooper, M Coleman, J Cuttner.   

Abstract

Two hundred fifty-two previously untreated evaluable patients with multiple myeloma were entered into a study testing a regimen of three intravenous alkylating agents, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and carmustine (BCNU), given in combination (BCMP) against a regimen employing oral melphalan (MP). Both regimens included a tapering course of prednisone. Objective responses based on the Myeloma Task Force criteria were significantly more frequent in the group receiving BCMP. Survival for the entire group of BCMP-treated patients was not significantly better than that for MP-treated patients (p = 0.62). However, when the survival of the poor-risk (high tumor cell load) group of patients treated with BCMP was compared with the survival of the poor-risk (high tumor cell load) group of patients treated with MP, an improvement in survival attributable to BCMP therapy was seen (p = 0.049 and 0.02, respectively). In the good-risk (low and intermediate tumor cell load) group, BCMP treatment resulted in a trend toward poorer survival, but this did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.080 and 0.23, respectively). These results indicate that optimal therapy in myeloma may be dependent on the extent of disease at the time of first treatment. Additional studies to explore the effects of treatment intensity and duration are needed in order to design improved myeloma treatment based on the patient's extent of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 444661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  7 in total

1.  A randomized multicentric study comparing alternating combination chemotherapy (VCMP/VBAP) and melphalan-prednisone in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J Bladé; J San Miguel; A Alcalá; J Maldonado; J García-Conde; M J Moro; M A Sanz Sanz; C Alonso; A Zubizarreta; C Besses
Journal:  Blut       Date:  1990-06

2.  Efficacy of the M-2 protocol in previously untreated patients with advanced multiple myeloma.

Authors:  H Gössinger; P Bettelheim; E Neumann; W Hinterberger; K Korninger; H Niessner; I Pabinger-Fasching; K Bauer; K Lechner
Journal:  Blut       Date:  1984-11

3.  A-phase II study of intravenous 6-thioguanine (NSC-752) in multiple myeloma. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Authors:  M B Edelstein; J J Crowley; F A Valeriote; J D Bonnet; J O Carden; R C Khanna; S E Salmon; J S Ungerleider
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 4.  Early versus deferred treatment for early stage multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Y He; K Wheatley; O Clark; A Glasmacher; H Ross; B Djulbegovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

5.  [Analysis of prognostic factors in plasmacytoma].

Authors:  W Gassmann; T Haferlach; N Schmitz; W Kayser; H H Euler; J Drews; H Löffler
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1984-10-01

6.  Multi-drug combination therapy with vincristine-melphalan-cyclophosphamide-prednisolone was more effective than cyclophosphamide-prednisolone in stage III myeloma. The Nagoya Myeloma Cooperative Study Group.

Authors:  K Shimizu; O Kamiya; N Hamajima; H Mizuno; M Kobayashi; N Hirabayashi; H Takeyama; R Kato; K Kawashima; M Nitta
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1990-12

7.  Treatment of multiple myeloma according to the extension of the disease: a prospective, randomised study comparing a less with a more aggressive cystostatic policy. Cooperative Group of Study and Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  A Riccardi; G Ucci; R Luoni; S Brugnatelli; O Mora; R Spanedda; A De Paoli; L Barbarano; M Di Stasi; F Alberio
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.