Literature DB >> 2126002

Multi-drug combination therapy with vincristine-melphalan-cyclophosphamide-prednisolone was more effective than cyclophosphamide-prednisolone in stage III myeloma. The Nagoya Myeloma Cooperative Study Group.

K Shimizu1, O Kamiya, N Hamajima, H Mizuno, M Kobayashi, N Hirabayashi, H Takeyama, R Kato, K Kawashima, M Nitta.   

Abstract

A cooperative randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of multi-drug combination chemotherapy (VMCP), vincristine-melphalan-cyclophosphamide-prednisolone) with CP (cyclophosphamide-prednisolone) for the treatment of multiple myeloma was performed. When the whole group of patients was evaluated, the choice of chemotherapy (VMCP or CP) was not a significant prognostic factor associated with response or survival by uni- or multivariate analysis, and the difference between the survival curves of the treatment groups was only marginally significant. However, when the analysis was confined to stage III patients, the choice of chemotherapy became a significant prognostic factor associated with both response rate and survival, and the statistical difference between survival curves was significant. Taking the disease characteristics of multiple myeloma into consideration, the better result obtained with multi-drug combination chemotherapy in the treatment of stage III patients is consistent with other studies supporting the superiority of multi-drug combination chemotherapy for patients with overt systemic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2126002      PMCID: PMC5918012          DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1990.tb02697.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res        ISSN: 0910-5050


  21 in total

1.  A GENERALIZED WILCOXON TEST FOR COMPARING ARBITRARILY SINGLY-CENSORED SAMPLES.

Authors:  E A GEHAN
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Combination chemotherapy for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  R Alexanian; J Bonnet; E Gehan; A Haut; J Hewlett; M Lane; R Monto; H Wilson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Staging and kinetics of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  B G Durie
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Comparison of two combination chemotherapy regimens for multiple myeloma: methyl-CCNU, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone versus melphalan and prednisone.

Authors:  F Cavagnaro; J M Lein; S Pavlovsky; J O Becherini; J E Pileggi; E Q Micheo; C Jait; A Musso; A Suárez; M Pizzolato
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1980-01

5.  Smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  R A Kyle; P R Greipp
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Phase III study of intermittent carmustine (BCNU), cyclophosphamide, and prednisone versus intermittent melphalan and prednisone in myeloma.

Authors:  N Abramson; P Lurie; W L Mietlowski; A Schilling; J M Bennett; J Horton
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1982-06

7.  The chemotherapy on plasma-cell myeloma and the incidence of acute leukemia.

Authors:  D E Bergsagel; A J Bailey; G R Langley; R N MacDonald; D F White; A B Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A randomized trial of melphalan and prednisone versus melphalan, prednisone, cyclophosphamide, MeCCNU, and vincristine in untreated multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Pavlovsky; J Saslavsky; M Tezanos Pinto; L Palmer; M Curuchet; J M Lein; G Garay; M Dragosky; E Quiroga-Micheo; A B Huberman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  [Treatment of multiple myeloma. High-dose intermittent administration of cyclophosphamide and prednisolone--follow up study of 10 years period].

Authors:  H Mizuno; N Ninomiya; H Ohta; K Tokoro; A Yasuma; K Ohnishi; Y Ikeda
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  1983-11

10.  Myelomatosis: comparison of melphalan and cyclophosphamide therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1971-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.