Literature DB >> 4420479

Modified laminar flow biological safety cabinet.

G J McGarrity, L L Coriell.   

Abstract

Tests are reported on a modified laminar flow biological safety cabinet in which the return air plenum that conducts air from the work area to the high efficiency particulate air filters is under negative pressure. Freon gas released inside the cabinet could not be detected outside by a freon gas detection method capable of detecting 10(-6) cc/s. When T3 bacteriophage was aerosolized 5 cm outside the front opening in 11 tests, no phage could be detected inside the cabinet with the motor-filter unit in operation. An average of 2.8 x 10(5) plaque-forming units (PFU)/ft(3) (ca. 0.028 m(3)) were detected with the motor-filter unit not in operation, a penetration of 0.0%. Aerosolization 5 cm inside the cabinet yielded an average of 10 PFU/ft(3) outside the cabinet with the motor-filter unit in operation and an average of 4.1 x 10(5) PFU/ft(3) with the motor-filter unit not in operation, a penetration of 0.002%. These values are the same order of effectiveness as the positive-pressure laminar flow biological safety cabinets previously tested. The advantages of the negative-pressure return plenum design include: (i) assurance that if cracks or leaks develop in the plenum it will not lead to discharge of contaminated air into the laboratory; and (ii) the price is lower due to reduced manufacturing costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4420479      PMCID: PMC365796          DOI: 10.1128/am.28.4.647-650.1974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0003-6919


  6 in total

Review 1.  Handling of infectious agents.

Authors:  A G Wedum; W E Barkley; A Hellman
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1972-12-01       Impact factor: 1.936

2.  Mass airflow cabinet for control of airborne infection of laboratory rodents.

Authors:  G J McGarrity; L L Coriell
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-08

3.  Containment of microbial aerosols in a microbiological safety cabinet.

Authors:  M S Barbeito; L A Taylor
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1968-08

4.  Microbiological studies on the performance of a laminar airflow biological cabinet.

Authors:  J J McDade; F L Sabel; R L Akers; R J Walker
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1968-07

5.  Evaluation of laminar flow microbiological safety cabinets.

Authors:  R H Staat; J W Beakley
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1968-10

6.  Biohazard hood to prevent infection during microbiological procedures.

Authors:  L L Coriell; G J McGarrity
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1968-12
  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Influence of crossdrafts on the performance of a biological safety cabinet.

Authors:  B W Rake
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Validation of cross-contamination control in biological safety cabinet for biotech/pharmaceutical manufacturing process.

Authors:  Shih-Cheng Hu; Angus Shiue; Jin-Xin Tu; Han-Yang Liu; Rong-Ben Chiu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Class II (laminar flow) biological safety cabinet.

Authors:  S W Newsom
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Bacteriological testing of a modified laminar flow microbiological safety cabinet.

Authors:  P J Heidt
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.271

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.