Literature DB >> 4874462

Microbiological studies on the performance of a laminar airflow biological cabinet.

J J McDade, F L Sabel, R L Akers, R J Walker.   

Abstract

Engineering and microbiological tests indicated that a typical, commercial laminar airflow cabinet was not effective in providing either product protection or agent containment. The cabinet was modified and tested through a series of alternate configurations to establish a set of design criteria. A mock-up cabinet was developed from these design criteria. The mock-up unit was evaluated for efficiency in providing both product protection and agent containment. In these evaluations, challenge methods were developed to simulate normal, in-use laboratory operations. Controlled bacterial or viral aerosol challenges were used at higher than normal levels to provide stringent test conditions. Test results indicated that the mock-up unit was considerably better in preventing agent penetration (0.1 to 0.2 particles per 100 ft(3) of air) than the commercial cabinet (5 to 6 particles per 100 ft(3) of air) during product protection tests. Similarly, agent containment was considerably better in the new cabinet (particle escape of 2 to 3 per 100 ft(3) of air at only one of the five test sites) than in the commercial cabinet (particle escape of 2 to 14 per 100 ft(3) of air at three of the five test sites).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1968        PMID: 4874462      PMCID: PMC547593          DOI: 10.1128/am.16.7.1086-1092.1968

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0003-6919


  5 in total

1.  A protective cabinet for handling infective material in the laboratory.

Authors:  R E WILLIAMS; O M LIDWELL
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1957-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Evaluation of laboratory fume hoods.

Authors:  H F SCHULTE; E C HYATT; H S JORDAN; R N MITCHELL
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc Q       Date:  1954-09

3.  Use of laminar air-flow equipment in microbiology.

Authors:  M S Favero; K R Berquist
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1968-01

4.  Comparative levels and types of microbial contamination detected in industrial clean rooms.

Authors:  M S Favero; J R Puleo; J H Marshall; G S Oxborrow
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1966-07

5.  Ultraclean operating room.

Authors:  J G Whitcomb; W E Clapper
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.565

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Influence of crossdrafts on the performance of a biological safety cabinet.

Authors:  B W Rake
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Biological safety cabinetry.

Authors:  R H Kruse; W H Puckett; J H Richardson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Validation of cross-contamination control in biological safety cabinet for biotech/pharmaceutical manufacturing process.

Authors:  Shih-Cheng Hu; Angus Shiue; Jin-Xin Tu; Han-Yang Liu; Rong-Ben Chiu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Class II (laminar flow) biological safety cabinet.

Authors:  S W Newsom
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Modified laminar flow biological safety cabinet.

Authors:  G J McGarrity; L L Coriell
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-10

6.  Prevention of airborne contamination and cross-contamination in germ-free mice by laminar flow.

Authors:  D van der Waaij; A H Andreas
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1971-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.