Literature DB >> 6051798

The variation of hand tremor with force in healthy subjects.

G G Sutton, K Sykes.   

Abstract

1. Total root-mean-square (r.m.s.) error over an effectively unrestricted band, and error power spectra from 0.256 to 12.5 c/s were measured for four subjects attempting to maintain fixed forces of 1-6 Lb. (0.45-2.72 kg) on a pressure joystick. The subject could see his errors as the deflexion of a cathode ray tube spot.2. The total r.m.s. error increases linearly with force with a considerable (positive) intercept when the line is extrapolated to zero force. Hence accuracy in the sense (r.m.s. error)/(force) increases with force for this type of control.3. The rate of increase of total r.m.s. error with force is greater in subjects with prominent tremor peaks in their power spectra at 8-10 c/s.4. At each frequency the r.m.s. error per unit bandwidth also increases linearly with force. Except at the very lowest frequencies the rate of increase is greater in subjects with prominent tremor peaks at 8-10 c/s. This is thought to account for the observation described in paragraph 3.5. The frequency of the tremor peak near 8-10 c/s is almost independent of the force exerted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1967        PMID: 6051798      PMCID: PMC1365500          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  3 in total

1.  Voluntary strength and fatigue.

Authors:  P A MERTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-03-29       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The silent period in a muscle of the human hand.

Authors:  P A MERTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1951-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The effect of withdrawal of visual presentation of errors upon the frequency spectrum of tremor in a manual task.

Authors:  G G Sutton; K Sykes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 5.182

  3 in total
  22 in total

1.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Stochastic optimal control and estimation methods adapted to the noise characteristics of the sensorimotor system.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  From task parameters to motor synergies: A hierarchical framework for approximately-optimal control of redundant manipulators.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Weiwei Li; Xiuchuan Pan
Journal:  J Robot Syst       Date:  2005-11

5.  Evidence for the flexible sensorimotor strategies predicted by optimal feedback control.

Authors:  Dan Liu; Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Joint-level kinetic redundancy is exploited to control limb-level forces during human hopping.

Authors:  Jasper T Yen; Arick G Auyang; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Structured variability of muscle activations supports the minimal intervention principle of motor control.

Authors:  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Madhusudhan Venkadesan; Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The contractile properties of human motor units during voluntary isometric contractions.

Authors:  H S Milner-Brown; R B Stein; R Yemm
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  In-Situ Force Augmentation Improves Surface Contact and Force Control.

Authors:  Randy Lee; Roberta L Klatzky; George D Stetten
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.487

10.  Genetical components of physiological tremor.

Authors:  P J Tyrer; J Kasriel
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.