Literature DB >> 4397638

Erythromycin-inducible resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: requirements for induction.

B Weisblum, C Siddhikol, C J Lai, V Demohn.   

Abstract

At least two functionally different types of ribosomes are found in strains of Staphylococcus aureus which display "dissociated" resistance to erythromycin. One type of ribosome is found under conditions of growth in ordinary nutrient broth, and the second is formed during growth in the presence of erythromycin. In these strains, erythromycin acts as an inducer of resistance to three different classes of inhibitors of the 50S ribosomal subunit-the macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B-type antibiotics. The optimal inducing concentration of erythromycin is between 10(-8) and 10(-7)m. Concentrations as low as 10(-9)m can produce a 10-fold increase in resistant cells over the uninduced, background level, whereas concentrations greater than 10(-7)m block induction owing to inhibition of protein synthesis. Resistant cells begin to appear within 5 to 10 min after addition of erythromycin (to 10(-7)m), and within 40 min (i.e., about one generation) more than 90% of the entire culture is resistant to erythromycin as well as to lincomycin and vernamycin B(alpha). A resistant culture becomes sensitive if grown for 90 min in the absence of erythromycin. The process of induction is inhibited by chloramphenicol and streptovaricin, which inhibit protein and ribonucleic acid synthesis, respectively, but not by novobiocin, which inhibits deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis. Resistant cells produced in this manner fail to concentrate (14)C-erythromycin and (14)C-lincomycin, but not (14)C-chloramphenicol. Constitutively erythromycin-resistant strains which do not require the presence of erythromycin for expression of resistance can be selected on media containing antibiotics which belong to any one of the three classes. Two patterns of constitutive resistance have been found. These are (i) generalized constitutive resistance-which involves resistance in the absence of erythromycin to all members of each of the three cited classes of 50S subunit inhibitors which were tested, and (ii) partial constitutive resistance-which involves different degrees of resistance, in the absence of erythromycin, to various members of the three classes. Several different patterns of variable constitutivity are possible. 50S ribosomal subunits isolated from induced or constitutively resistant cells show decreased ability to bind erythromycin and lincomycin, and possible enzymatic inactivation of these antibiotics has been rigorously excluded. The induced change, therefore involves modification of ribosome structure rather than modification of the antibiotic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1971        PMID: 4397638      PMCID: PMC248701          DOI: 10.1128/jb.106.3.835-847.1971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  16 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Y CHABBERT
Journal:  Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris)       Date:  1956-06

2.  Drug resistance of staphylococci. IX. Inducible resistance to macrolide antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H Hashimoto; H Oshima; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Jpn J Microbiol       Date:  1968-09

3.  Penicillinase plasmids of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R P Novick
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1967 Jan-Feb

4.  Inhibition of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase reaction of Escherichia coli by an antimicrobial antibiotic, streptovaricin.

Authors:  S Mizuno; H Yamazaki; K Nitta; H Umezawa
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1968-04-22

5.  A mode of resistance to macrolide antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Y Nakajima; M Inoue; Y Oka; S Yamagishi
Journal:  Jpn J Microbiol       Date:  1968-06

6.  Drug resistance of staphylococci. Foation of erythromycin-ribosome complex. Decrease in the formation of erythromycin-ribosome complex in erythromycin resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T Saito; H Hashimoto; S Mitsuhashi
Journal:  Jpn J Microbiol       Date:  1969-03

7.  Erythromycin-inducible resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: survey of antibiotic classes involved.

Authors:  B Weisblum; V Demohn
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Mode of action of streptolydigin.

Authors:  C Siddhikol; J W Erbstoeszer; B Weisblum
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Altered methylation of ribosomal RNA in an erythromycin-resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C J Lai; B Weisblum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Mode of action of novobiocin in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D H Smith; B D Davis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  55 in total

1.  Thymineless bacteriophage induction in Staphylococcus aureus. II. Specific transduction of constitutive and inducible erythromycin resistance.

Authors:  M Lindberg; L Rudin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Heterogeneity of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance phenotypes in enterococci.

Authors:  Yu-Hong Min; Jae-Hee Jeong; Yun-Jeong Choi; Hee-Jeong Yun; Kyungwon Lee; Mi-Ja Shim; Jin-Hwan Kwak; Eung-Chil Choi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Effects of tylosin use on erythromycin resistance in enterococci isolated from swine.

Authors:  Charlene R Jackson; Paula J Fedorka-Cray; John B Barrett; Scott R Ladely
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Induction of erythromycin resistance in Staphyloccus aureus by erythromycin derivatives.

Authors:  S Pestka; R Vince; R LeMahieu; F Weiss; L Fern; J Unowsky
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Evolutionary relationships of the Bacillus licheniformis macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance elements.

Authors:  M Israeli-Reches; Y Weinrauch; D Dubnau
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1984

6.  In vitro induction of resistance to erythromycin by its metabolite.

Authors:  J Majer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Susceptibility of mycobacteria to rifampin.

Authors:  C L Woodley; J O Kilburn; H L David; V A Silcox
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Induction of ermAMR from a clinical strain of Enterococcus faecalis by 16-membered-ring macrolide antibiotics.

Authors:  T G Oh; A R Kwon; E C Choi
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Inducible and constitutive resistance to macrolide antibiotics and lincomycin in clinically isolated strains of Streptococcus pyogenes.

Authors:  S L Hyder; M M Streitfeld
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Acquisition of antibiotic resistance by Staphylococcus aureus in skin patients.

Authors:  J Naidoo; W C Noble
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.