Literature DB >> 15240302

Effects of tylosin use on erythromycin resistance in enterococci isolated from swine.

Charlene R Jackson1, Paula J Fedorka-Cray, John B Barrett, Scott R Ladely.   

Abstract

The effect of tylosin on erythromycin-resistant enterococci was examined on three farms; farm A used tylosin for growth promotion, farm B used tylosin for treatment of disease, and farm C did not use tylosin for either growth promotion or disease treatment. A total of 1,187 enterococci were isolated from gestation, farrowing, suckling, nursery, and finishing swine from the farms. From a subset of those isolates (n = 662), 59% (124 out of 208), 28% (80 out of 281), and 2% (4 out of 170) were resistant to erythromycin (MIC >/= 8 microg/ml) from farms A, B, and C, respectively. PCR analysis and Southern blotting revealed that 95% (65 out of 68) of isolates chosen from all three farms for further study were positive for ermB, but all were negative for ermA and ermC. By using Southern blotting, ermB was localized to the chromosome in 56 of the isolates while 9 isolates from farms A and B contained ermB on two similar-sized plasmid bands (12 to 16 kb). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis revealed that the isolates were genetically diverse and represented a heterogeneous population of enterococci. This study suggests that although there was resistance to a greater number of enterococcal isolates on a farm where tylosin was used as a growth promotant, resistant enterococci also existed on a farm where no antimicrobial agents were used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15240302      PMCID: PMC444810          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4205-4210.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  24 in total

1.  Indication of transposition of a mobile DNA element containing the vat(D) and erm(B) genes in Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  A M Hammerum; S E Flannagan; D B Clewell; L B Jensen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark.

Authors:  F M Aarestrup; A M Seyfarth; H D Emborg; K Pedersen; R S Hendriksen; F Bager
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  The life and times of the Enterococcus.

Authors:  B E Murray
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification.

Authors:  B Weisblum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Characterization of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin.

Authors:  L A Thal; J W Chow; R Mahayni; H Bonilla; M B Perri; S A Donabedian; J Silverman; S Taber; M J Zervos
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Inducible erythromycin resistance in bacteria.

Authors:  B Weisblum
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.291

7.  Evidence for a disseminated erythromycin resistance determinant mediated by Tn917-like sequences among group D streptococci isolated from pigs, chickens, and humans.

Authors:  L D Rollins; L N Lee; D J LeBlanc
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Erythromycin-inducible resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: requirements for induction.

Authors:  B Weisblum; C Siddhikol; C J Lai; V Demohn
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Effects of tylosin feeding on the antibiotic resistance of selected gram-positive bacteria in pigs.

Authors:  P J Christie; J N Davidson; R P Novick; G M Dunny
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.156

10.  Identification and composition of the streptococcal and enterococcal flora of tonsils, intestines and faeces of pigs.

Authors:  L A Devriese; J Hommez; B Pot; F Haesebrouck
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1994-07
View more
  24 in total

1.  Antimicrobial drug resistance genes do not convey a secondary fitness advantage to calf-adapted Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Artashes R Khachatryan; Dale D Hancock; Thomas E Besser; Douglas R Call
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Tetracyclines and tetracycline resistance in agricultural soils: microcosm and field studies.

Authors:  Heike Schmitt; Krispin Stoob; Gerd Hamscher; Eric Smit; Willem Seinen
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Development and application of real-time PCR assays for quantification of erm genes conferring resistance to macrolides-lincosamides-streptogramin B in livestock manure and manure management systems.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Zhongtang Yu; Frederick C Michel; Thomas Wittum; Mark Morrison
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Fate of chlortetracycline- and tylosin-resistant bacteria in an aerobic thermophilic sequencing batch reactor treating swine waste.

Authors:  Martin R Chénier; Pierre Juteau
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Selection of fecal enterococci exhibiting tcrB-mediated copper resistance in pigs fed diets supplemented with copper.

Authors:  R G Amachawadi; N W Shelton; X Shi; J Vinasco; S S Dritz; M D Tokach; J L Nelssen; H M Scott; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Alterations of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Antibiotic Resistance under Environmental Pressure.

Authors:  Mengfei Peng; Serajus Salaheen; Robert L Buchanan; Debabrata Biswas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on human health.

Authors:  Bonnie M Marshall; Stuart B Levy
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Frequency of antibiotic resistance in a swine facility 2.5 years after a ban on antibiotics.

Authors:  Sepideh Pakpour; Suha Jabaji; Martin R Chénier
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Diverse and abundant antibiotic resistance genes in Chinese swine farms.

Authors:  Yong-Guan Zhu; Timothy A Johnson; Jian-Qiang Su; Min Qiao; Guang-Xia Guo; Robert D Stedtfeld; Syed A Hashsham; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Occurrence of the transferable copper resistance gene tcrB among fecal enterococci of U.S. feedlot cattle fed copper-supplemented diets.

Authors:  R G Amachawadi; H M Scott; C A Alvarado; T R Mainini; J Vinasco; J S Drouillard; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.