Literature DB >> 7374098

Esophageal transmural potential difference in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux.

V F Eckardt, B Adami.   

Abstract

Esophageal electrical potential difference (PD) was studied in 9 patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux and in 9 healthy control subjects. None of the patients revealed gross mucosal damage by radiography or endoscopy, but all of them showed positive acid perfusion studies. In the stomach and across the lower esophageal sphincter PD profiles were remarkably similar in patients and controls. Throughout the lower esophagus however, PD values were slightly higher in patients with symptomatic reflux than in healthy volunteers. These data are in contrast to a previous investigation, in which patients with reflux-induced gross mucosal damage revealed a decreased PD in the lower esophagus. Thus it is concluded that PD measurements of the lower esophagus do not appear to be a valuable test in the differentiation of chest pain of cardiac and esophageal origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7374098     DOI: 10.1007/bf01476571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0023-2173


  25 in total

1.  IDENTIFICATION OF THE GASTROESOPHAGEAL MUCOSAL JUNCTION BY TRANSMUCOSAL POTENTIAL IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS WITH HIATAL HERNIA.

Authors:  W J HELM; J F SCHLEGEL; C F CODE; W H SUMMERSKILL
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  The normal human esophageal mucosa: a histological reappraisal.

Authors:  W M Weinstein; E R Bogoch; K L Bowes
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Barrett esophagus: the columnar-epithelial-lined lower esophagus.

Authors:  J N Burgess; W S Payne; H A Andersen; L H Weiland; H C Carlson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man.

Authors:  F Ismail-Beigi; P F Horton; C E Pope
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Reference electrode sites in determination of potential difference across the gastroesophageal mucosal junction.

Authors:  R N Grantham; C F Code; J F Schlegel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Profile of gastric potential difference in man. Effects of aspirin, alcohol, bile, and endogenous acid.

Authors:  M G Geall; S F Phillips; W H Summerskill
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Profile of pH, pressure, and potential difference at gastroduodenal junction in man.

Authors:  S Andersson; M I Grossman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  [Transmural electronic potential difference--a functional parameter of the gastric mucosal barrier (author's transl)].

Authors:  W F Caspary
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Transmural electrical potential difference in the mammalian esophagus in vivo.

Authors:  K S Turner; D W Powell; C N Carney; R C Orlando; E M Bozymski
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Effect of acetylsalicylic acid on the amphibian gastric mucosa. I. Electrophysiological and permeability changes.

Authors:  J G Spenney; M Bhown
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pathophysiology of acute acid injury in rabbit esophageal epithelium.

Authors:  R C Orlando; D W Powell; C N Carney
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Endoscopic measurement of oesophageal transmucosal potential difference in reflux oesophagitis.

Authors:  B J Collins; R J McFarland; J M Sloan; A H Love
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 23.059

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.