Literature DB >> 4094511

[Postoperative on-demand analgesia with pentazocine (Fortral)].

K A Lehmann, B Tenbuhs, W Hoeckle.   

Abstract

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, intravenous self-application of narcotics) was studied during the early postoperative period. Subjects were 40 ASA I-III patients recovering from elective major and minor surgery (each 20 having undergone abdominal or orthopaedic operations). Pentazocine bolusses of each 8 mg were available via a hand-button whenever the patients felt pain relief necessary, and delivered by a microprocessor-controlled injection pump (On-Demand Analgesia Computer, ODAC). Hourly maximum dose was set to 60 mg with a pump refractory time of 1 min between valid demands. A continuous low-dose pentazocine infusion (1 mg/h) was additionally administered in order to prevent catheter obstruction. Duration of the PCA period was 20.3 +/- 5.9 h (mean, standard deviation). During this time, 20.0 +/- 12.7 demands per patient were recorded resulting in mean pentazocine consumption of 135.6 +/- 81.4 micrograms/kg/h. Self-administration was characterized by considerable intra- and interindividual variability. There were no statistically significant differences with regard of pentazocine consumption or pain relief between abdominal and orthopaedic patients, nor could any be demonstrated between the sexes. Similarly, no clear differences were found after various anaesthetic techniques (neuroleptanalgesia, halothane or spinal anaesthesia). Over-all efficacy and patient acceptance proved to be excellent. Effectiveness of PCA was judged superior by about 68% of patients when compared with previously experienced conventional postoperative analgesia. Side effects (nausea, emesis, sweating) occurred in about 10-18% but were usually of minor intensity. Circulatory or respiratory problems were not observed during the PCA period. Patient-controlled analgesia is discussed as a promising concept for the treatment of acute pain and clinical pain research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4094511     DOI: 10.1007/BF01241943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir        ISSN: 0023-8236


  37 in total

1.  The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain.

Authors:  S I Revill; J O Robinson; M Rosen; M I Hogg
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Personal view.

Authors:  J M Smith; J E Utting
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-10-09

3.  A pharmacokinetic approach to postoperative pain: continuous infusion of pethidine.

Authors:  J V Stapleton; K L Austin; L E Mather
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 4.  The clinical assessment of pain.

Authors:  W B Loan; J W Dundee
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1967-06

5.  Narcotic analgesics in postoperative pain relief in adults.

Authors:  T Tammisto; I Tigerstedt
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1982

6.  The quality of mercy.

Authors:  M Angell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-01-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  A H Masson
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  1971

8.  Patient administration of I.V. buprenorphine for postoperative pain relief using the "Cardiff" demand analgesia apparatus.

Authors:  J M Gibbs; H D Johnson; F M Davis
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  Preoperative predictors of postoperative pain.

Authors:  L E Scott; G A Clum; J B Peoples
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Drugs or drums: what relieves postoperative pain?

Authors:  M Keeri-Szanto
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  3 in total

1.  Patient-controlled analgesia with nalbuphine, a new narcotic agonist-antagonist, for the treatment of postoperative pain.

Authors:  K A Lehmann; B Tenbuhs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  [Postoperative pain: patient's self-report versus observer's rating.].

Authors:  H W Striebel; J Hackenberger; A Wessel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Influence of naloxone on the postoperative analgesic and respiratory effects of buprenorphine.

Authors:  K A Lehmann; U Reichling; R Wirtz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.