Literature DB >> 18415606

[Postoperative pain: patient's self-report versus observer's rating.].

H W Striebel1, J Hackenberger, A Wessel.   

Abstract

In 60 women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy, a total of 420 pain evaluations of postoperative pain intensity were performed by an observer and the patients. Pain intensity was rated by the observer on a visual analogue scale. The patients themselves evaluated their pain on a visual analogue scale and on a 101-point numerical rating scale. There was good agreement between pain intensity on the visual analogue scale and the 101-point numerical rating scale in the patients' self-assessment (r (2)=0.74;y=0.81x+11.4). The pain intensities determined by the observer on the visual analogue scale were markedly lower, on average than the patients' self-report (P<0.0001). The pain intensities rated by the observer on the visual analogue scale were on averange 37.7% of the patients' self-assessments on the visual analogue scale. The correlation between patients' self-assessments and observers' ratings was poor (r (2)=0.28;y=0.66x+31.3). There was also no clear correlation between pain intensity and heart rate or arterial blood pressure. A reliable assessment of pain intensity can only be performed by patients' self-assessment and not by observers' ratings.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 18415606     DOI: 10.1007/BF02528602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  23 in total

1.  Postoperative pain relief--time to take our heads out of the sand?

Authors:  M Harmer
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Postoperative analgesia after triple nerve block for fractured neck of femur.

Authors:  G Hood; D L Edbrooke; S P Gerrish
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  [Postoperative pain therapy with 1-methadone and metamizole. A randomized study within the scope of intravenous on-demand analgesia].

Authors:  K A Lehmann; M Abu-Shibika; G Horrichs-Haermeyer
Journal:  Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed       Date:  1990-04

4.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  [Status of postoperative pain therapy in West Germany. Results of a representative survey].

Authors:  K A Lehmann; C Henn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Postoperative pain control. A survey of current practice.

Authors:  P Semple; I J Jackson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement.

Authors:  E Kremer; J H Atkinson; R J Ignelzi
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Ketorolac and acetaminophen for orthopedic postoperative pain.

Authors:  H J McQuay; P Poppleton; D Carroll; R J Summerfield; R E Bullingham; R A Moore
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Patient attitudes to postoperative pain relief.

Authors:  B D Donovan
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.669

10.  Comparison of infusions of morphine and lysine acetyl salicylate for the relief of pain after surgery.

Authors:  J N Cashman; R M Jones; J M Foster; A P Adams
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bone remodelling around the Metha® short stem implant - Clinical and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) results.

Authors:  Markus Fischer; Nicholas A Beckmann; Hans-Georg Simank
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-09

2.  [Perioperative analgesia in adults : The concept of balanced analgesia.].

Authors:  J Jage
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [Organization model for postoperative pain management in a basic-care hospital].

Authors:  W Bernd; H Seintsch; R Amstad; G Burri; V Weber
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.041

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.