Literature DB >> 3402520

Influence of naloxone on the postoperative analgesic and respiratory effects of buprenorphine.

K A Lehmann1, U Reichling, R Wirtz.   

Abstract

Eighty patients recovering from major operations were investigated to evaluate the influence of naloxone on the analgesic and respiratory depressant properties of buprenorphine. They were randomly assigned to two groups to self-administer either buprenorphine (Group B) or a mixture of buprenorphine and naloxone (fraction 60%; Group BN) in the early postoperative period by means of the On-Demand Analgesia Computer (ODAC). The duration of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was 21.0 h (B) or 23.5 h (BN), during which 12.2 (B) and 18.2 (BN) demands per patient were recorded, representing significantly different consumption of buprenorphine 0.80 (B) and 1.07 (BN) microgram.kg-1.h-1. Retrospective pain scores were significantly better in Group B, and respiratory rate was significantly higher in Group BN. The analgesia was judged superior by 81% (B) and 88% (BN) of the patients compared to conventional postoperative pain treatment. The minimum effective buprenorphine concentration (MEC) varied greatly in both groups with no significant differences between them (median 0.4 ng.ml-1, range 0.1-8.6 ng.ml-1); intra-individual variability was lower (67.9% B, and 58.2% BN) than inter-individual variability (107.3% B and 84.0% BN). Accumulation in plasma and acute tolerance did not occur. Thus, admixture of 60% naloxone decreased both the analgesic and respiratory depressant effects of buprenorphine which were generally independent of plasma concentrations. The analgesia achieved with the buprenorphine/naloxone mixture under patient-controlled conditions was comparable to that of other narcotic analgesics. Accordingly, this drug combination may be expected to give clinically adequate analgesia without notable impairement of spontaneous respiration, whilst withdrawal symptoms would probably arise in drug addicts abusing other opiates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3402520     DOI: 10.1007/bf00542434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  23 in total

1.  [Intra- and postoperative interactions between the 2 opioids fentanyl and buprenorphine].

Authors:  H Müller; H Gerlach; H Gips; M Richter; U Börner; G Hempelmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Patient-controlled analgesia with nalbuphine, a new narcotic agonist-antagonist, for the treatment of postoperative pain.

Authors:  K A Lehmann; B Tenbuhs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  A long-term open, clinical and pharmacokinetic assessment of sublingual buprenorphine in patients suffering from chronic pain.

Authors:  H Adriaensen; B Mattelaer; H Vanmeenen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg       Date:  1985-03

4.  Patient-controlled analgesic therapy, Part II: Individual analgesic demand and analgesic plasma concentrations of pethidine in postoperative pain.

Authors:  A Tamsen; P Hartvig; C Fagerlund; B Dahlström
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Patient administration of I.V. buprenorphine for postoperative pain relief using the "Cardiff" demand analgesia apparatus.

Authors:  J M Gibbs; H D Johnson; F M Davis
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Buprenorphine kinetics.

Authors:  R E Bullingham; H J McQuay; A Moore; M R Bennett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Postoperative pain control with methadone: influence of supplementary methadone doses and blood concentration--response relationships.

Authors:  G K Gourlay; R J Willis; P R Wilson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Postoperative pain relief with naloxone. Severe respiratory depression and pain after high dose buprenorphine.

Authors:  J F Schmidt; B Chraemmer-Jørgensen; J E Pedersen; A Risbo
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  "Patient demand" postoperative analgesia with buprenorphine. Comparison between sublingual and i.m. administration.

Authors:  M V Shah; D I Jones; M Rosen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  [Postoperative on-demand analgesia with morphine].

Authors:  K A Lehmann; B Gördes; W Hoeckle
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.041

View more
  9 in total

1.  Intrathecal delivery of a mutant micro-opioid receptor activated by naloxone as a possible antinociceptive paradigm.

Authors:  J H Kao; S L Chen; H I Ma; P Y Law; P L Tao; H H Loh
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 2.  Drug interactions with patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  Jorn Lotsch; Carsten Skarke; Irmgard Tegeder; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Treatment principles for the use of opioids in pain of nonmalignant origin.

Authors:  S A Schug; A F Merry; R H Acland
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Effects of low-dose naloxone on opioid therapy in pediatric patients: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  C L S Cheung; M van Dijk; J W Green; D Tibboel; K J S Anand
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Methylnaltrexone: the evidence for its use in the management of opioid-induced constipation.

Authors:  Peter Deibert; Carola Xander; Hubert E Blum; Gerhild Becker
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2010-06-15

6.  A comparison of intravenous-based and epidural-based techniques for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kohki Nishikawa; Saori Kimura; Yuki Shimodate; Motohiko Igarashi; Akiyoshi Namiki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 7.  Drug interactions of clinical significance with opioid analgesics.

Authors:  P M Maurer; R R Bartkowski
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Search for the "ideal analgesic" in pain treatment by engineering the mu-opioid receptor.

Authors:  Pao-Luh Tao; Ping-Yee Law; Horace H Loh
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.885

Review 9.  Tolerance and withdrawal from prolonged opioid use in critically ill children.

Authors:  Kanwaljeet J S Anand; Douglas F Willson; John Berger; Rick Harrison; Kathleen L Meert; Jerry Zimmerman; Joseph Carcillo; Christopher J L Newth; Parthak Prodhan; J Michael Dean; Carol Nicholson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 7.124

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.