Literature DB >> 4078856

Paternalism modernised.

G B Weiss.   

Abstract

The practice of paternalism has changed along with developments in medicine, philosophy, law, sociology and psychology. Physicians have learned that a patient's values are a factor in determining what is best for that patient. Modern paternalism continues to be guided by the principle that the physician decides what is best for the patient and pursues that course of action, taking into account the values and interests of the patient. In the autonomy model of the doctor-patient relationship, patient values are decisive. In the paternalistic model, they are but one among several factors the physician must consider in making a medical decision. Although difficult to practise because of limitations in empathising with another person, modern paternalism remains a way to achieve maximum patient benefit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Philosophical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4078856      PMCID: PMC1375206          DOI: 10.1136/jme.11.4.184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  15 in total

1.  Paternalistic behavior.

Authors:  Bernard Gert; Charles M Culver
Journal:  Philos Public Aff       Date:  1976

2.  What to tell cancer patients. A study of medical attitudes.

Authors:  D OKEN
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1961-04-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  100 cases of hemipelvectomy: a personal experience.

Authors:  T R Miller
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Changes in physicians' attitudes toward telling the cancer patient.

Authors:  D H Novack; R Plumer; R L Smith; H Ochitill; G R Morrow; J M Bennett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The California breast cancer law and government-mandated patient education.

Authors:  S K Carter
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: a model of physician conscience for the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  D C Thomasma
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The do-not-resuscitate order in a teaching hospital: considerations and a suggested policy.

Authors:  S H Miles; R Cranford; A L Schultz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Breast cancer: the treatment of choice.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 2.683

9.  Cancer nursing and the law: informed refusal. Part IV.

Authors:  W J Gargaro
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.592

10.  Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  B J McNeil; R Weichselbaum; S G Pauker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  11 in total

1.  The question of access.

Authors:  Carol J Cohen; Joseph C d'Oronzio
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1989

2.  Technical expertise as an ethical form: towards an ethics of distance.

Authors:  M Girard
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Ethical dilemmas in nursing.

Authors:  J Wilson-Barnett
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The physician-patient relationship and the ethic of care.

Authors:  A Freedman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Providers' roles in enhancing patients' adherence to pain self management.

Authors:  Lindsey Dorflinger; Robert D Kerns; Stephen M Auerbach
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  The battering of informed consent.

Authors:  M Kottow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Can paternalism be modernised?

Authors:  E Matthews
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 8.  Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate.

Authors:  R B Deber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Consent for anaesthesia.

Authors:  S M White
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Limited autonomy and partnership: professional relationships in health care.

Authors:  J Wilson-Barnett
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.