Literature DB >> 2926780

Limited autonomy and partnership: professional relationships in health care.

J Wilson-Barnett1.   

Abstract

Principles of autonomy and self-determination have been upheld as vital to modern-day medical and ethical practice. However, the complexities of current health care and changes in the expectation of some patients and their families justify a review of such concepts. Their limitations and relativities may suggest that other descriptions of partnership and negotiated goal-setting, while based on respect for autonomy, reflect more modern and ideal multi-disciplinary practices. Discussion should extend beyond the 'classic' participants of patient and doctor to a more realistic picture where other health carers are included. It is therefore apposite that other professional relationships are considered as they affect areas of doctors' and patients' responsibilities. Such partnership between members of the team may not be without problems and conflict, but the principle of negotiated agreements could result in more long-term harmony, and greater patient welfare.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2926780      PMCID: PMC1375754          DOI: 10.1136/jme.15.1.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  8 in total

1.  A nurse practitioner in general practice: working style and pattern of consultations.

Authors:  B Stilwell; S Greenfield; M Drury; F M Hull
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-04

2.  Studies evaluating patient teaching: implications for practice.

Authors:  J Wilson-Barnett; J Osborne
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  Patient teaching or patient counselling?

Authors:  J Wilson-Barnett
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Informed consent: what does it mean?

Authors:  M D Kirby
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Patients' ethical obligation for their health.

Authors:  R C Sider; C D Clements
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy.

Authors:  M S Komrad
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Informed consent and the psychiatric patient.

Authors:  A R Dyer; S Bloch
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Paternalism modernised.

Authors:  G B Weiss
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.903

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.