Literature DB >> 4069724

Comparing patients' and their physicians' assessments of pain.

M Hodgkins, D Albert, L Daltroy.   

Abstract

Patients and their physicians were asked to estimate the pain from needle aspiration and/or injection of joints or soft tissue using the visual analogue scale. On a 10-point scale, the mean score for patients prior to and after the procedure was 4.76 +/- 2.97 and 4.01 +/- 3.51, respectively, and for physicians was 4.15 +/- 2.45 and 3.36 +/- 2.08. Analysis of correlations revealed that prior to the procedure patients could predict their 'true' pain (after the procedure assessment) better (r = 0.765) than physicians could predict patients' pain (r = 0.542). However, physicians significantly improved their estimates of patients' scores by observing the procedure. After the procedure correlation between physician and patient scores increased to 0.62 (P = 0.003). The overall pattern of results suggests that experienced patients may be somewhat better than their physicians in predicting the level of pain they experience with a procedure, but that physicians' estimates appear to be accurate enough to allow them to give useful information about the degree of discomfort that a patient will experience during an invasive procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4069724     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90105-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  7 in total

1.  Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors.

Authors:  S Sakura; T Nonoue; T Nomura; K Hara; H Iwakura; Y Kosaka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  [Validation of the new version of the minimal documentation system (MIDOS) for patients in palliative care : the German version of the edmonton symptom assessment scale (ESAS)].

Authors:  S Stiel; M E Matthes; L Bertram; C Ostgathe; F Elsner; L Radbruch
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Quality of life in chronic illness: perceptions of parents and paediatricians.

Authors:  A J Janse; G Sinnema; C S P M Uiterwaal; J L L Kimpen; R J B J Gemke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Racial bias in pain perception and response: experimental examination of automatic and deliberate processes.

Authors:  Vani A Mathur; Jennifer A Richeson; Judith A Paice; Michael Muzyka; Joan Y Chiao
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.820

5.  Evaluating the quality of life of cancer patients: assessments by patients, significant others, physicians and nurses.

Authors:  K C Sneeuw; N K Aaronson; M A Sprangers; S B Detmar; L D Wever; J H Schornagel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Patients in palliative care-Development of a predictive model for anxiety using routine data.

Authors:  Sonja Hofmann; Stephanie Hess; Carsten Klein; Gabriele Lindena; Lukas Radbruch; Christoph Ostgathe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ultrasound assessment of haemoperitoneum in ectopic pregnancy: derivation of a prediction model.

Authors:  Arnaud Fauconnier; Ali Mabrouk; Laurent J Salomon; Jean-Pierre Bernard; Yves Ville
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 5.469

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.