Literature DB >> 15278813

Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors.

S Sakura1, T Nonoue, T Nomura, K Hara, H Iwakura, Y Kosaka.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare the assessment of pain intensity by 59 patients and by their doctors according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and when coughing at 5 and 20 hr after major abdominal surgery. The rating given by the patients, who received epidural analgesia to relieve postoperative pain, was significantly above, and moreover, significantly correlated with that given by the doctors at any time or under any condition of the assessment. However, the correlation between the ratings given by patients and doctors at rest at 5 hr after surgery was low (r = 0.39, rs = 0.38) and significantly different from that when coughing at 20 hr after the operation (r = 0.79, rs = 0.80). Our findings indicate that the assessment of postoperative pain may be associated with some unreliability, especially during early periods, when using the subjective or objective-rated VAS at rest separately, and thus requires the combined use or the concomitant use of the VAS when coughing. Substitutional use of the objective-rated VAS for the subjective-rated VAS is not advised.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 15278813     DOI: 10.1007/s0054030070287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  12 in total

1.  Anxiety and pain in surgical patients.

Authors:  A Martinez-Urrutia
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1975-08

2.  The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain.

Authors:  S I Revill; J O Robinson; M Rosen; M I Hogg
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Ordinal scale and statistics in medical research.

Authors:  M Forrest; B Andersen
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-02-22

4.  Pain tolerance: differences according to age, sex and race.

Authors:  K M Woodrow; G D Friedman; A B Siegelaub; M F Collen
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1972 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Continuous-plus-on-demand epidural infusion of morphine for postoperative pain relief by means of a small, externally worn infusion device.

Authors:  J Chrubasik; K Wiemers
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Edgar E Ohnhaus; Rolf Adler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Anna Maria Carlsson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Comparing patients' and their physicians' assessments of pain.

Authors:  M Hodgkins; D Albert; L Daltroy
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Preoperative predictors of postoperative pain.

Authors:  L E Scott; G A Clum; J B Peoples
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Postthoracotomy pain and pulmonary function following epidural and systemic morphine.

Authors:  M Shulman; A N Sandler; J W Bradley; P S Young; J Brebner
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of postoperative pain: Contributing factors to the differences between patients and doctors.

Authors:  S Sakura; T Nonoue; T Nomura; T Nakatani
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.078

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.