Literature DB >> 24462976

Racial bias in pain perception and response: experimental examination of automatic and deliberate processes.

Vani A Mathur1, Jennifer A Richeson2, Judith A Paice3, Michael Muzyka4, Joan Y Chiao4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Racial disparities in pain treatment pose a significant public health and scientific problem. Prior studies have demonstrated that clinicians and nonclinicians are less perceptive of, and suggest less treatment for, the pain of African Americans relative to European Americans. Here we investigate the effects of explicit/implicit patient race presentation, patient race, and perceiver race on pain perception and response. African American and European American participants rated pain perception, empathy, helping motivation, and treatment suggestion in response to vignettes about patients' pain. Vignettes were accompanied by a rapid (implicit) or static (explicit) presentation of an African or European American patient's face. Participants perceived and responded more to European American patients in the implicit prime condition, when the effect of patient race was below the level of conscious regulation. This effect was reversed when patient race was presented explicitly. Additionally, female participants perceived and responded more to the pain of all patients, relative to male participants, and in the implicit prime condition, African American participants were more perceptive and responsive than European Americans to the pain of all patients. Taken together, these results suggest that known disparities in pain treatment may be largely due to automatic (below the level of conscious regulation) rather than deliberate (subject to conscious regulation) biases. These biases were not associated with traditional implicit measures of racial attitudes, suggesting that biases in pain perception and response may be independent of general prejudice. PERSPECTIVE: Results suggest that racial biases in pain perception and treatment are at least partially due to automatic processes. When the relevance of patient race is made explicit, however, biases are attenuated and even reversed. We also find preliminary evidence that African Americans may be more sensitive to the pain of others than are European Americans.
Copyright © 2014 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Racial disparities; empathy; explicit racial bias; implicit racial bias; pain

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24462976      PMCID: PMC4011980          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.01.488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  54 in total

1.  Non-verbal communication between primary care physicians and older patients: how does race matter?

Authors:  Irena Stepanikova; Qian Zhang; Darryl Wieland; G Paul Eleazer; Thomas Stewart
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

Authors:  Anthony G Greenwald; Brian A Nosek; Mahzarin R Banaji
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

Review 3.  Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use.

Authors:  Russell H Fazio; Michael A Olson
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Racial-ethnic biases, time pressure, and medical decisions.

Authors:  Irena Stepanikova
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2012-07-17

5.  Pain rating by patients and physicians: evidence of systematic pain miscalibration.

Authors:  Laetitia Marquié; Eric Raufaste; Dominique Lauque; Claudette Mariné; Marie Ecoiffier; Paul Sorum
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Comparing patients' and their physicians' assessments of pain.

Authors:  M Hodgkins; D Albert; L Daltroy
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses.

Authors:  Xiaojing Xu; Xiangyu Zuo; Xiaoying Wang; Shihui Han
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Empathy for pain: the effects of prior experience and sex.

Authors:  M A Preis; B Kroener-Herwig
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.931

9.  The perception of pain in others: how gender, race, and age influence pain expectations.

Authors:  Laura D Wandner; Cindy D Scipio; Adam T Hirsh; Calia A Torres; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 5.383

10.  Virtual human technology: capturing sex, race, and age influences in individual pain decision policies.

Authors:  Adam T Hirsh; Ashraf F Alqudah; Lauren A Stutts; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 7.926

View more
  24 in total

1.  Factors Influencing Judgments to Consult Prescription Monitoring Programs: A Factorial Survey Experiment.

Authors:  Matthew J Witry; Barbara J St Marie; Brahmendra Reddy Viyyuri; Paul D Windschitl
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 1.929

2.  How important is social support in determining patients' suitability for transplantation? Results from a National Survey of Transplant Clinicians.

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Joanna Emerson; Zeeshan Butt; Elisa J Gordon; Douglas W Hanto; Jennifer Perloff; Norman Daniels; Tara A Lavelle
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Shared Decision Making Among Clinicians and Asian American and Pacific Islander Sexual and Gender Minorities: An Intersectional Approach to Address a Critical Care Gap.

Authors:  Judy Y Tan; Lucy J Xu; Fanny Y Lopez; Justin L Jia; Mai T Pho; Karen E Kim; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.151

4.  Variation in opioid analgesia administration and discharge prescribing for emergency department patients with suspected urolithiasis.

Authors:  Anna E Wentz; Ralph R C Wang; Brandon D L Marshall; Theresa I Shireman; Tao Liu; Roland C Merchant
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 5.  Racial and ethnic differences in the experience and treatment of noncancer pain.

Authors:  Samantha M Meints; Alejandro Cortes; Calia A Morais; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Pain Manag       Date:  2019-05-29

Review 6.  Pain in Cancer Survivors: How to Manage.

Authors:  Judith A Paice
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06

7.  Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites.

Authors:  Kelly M Hoffman; Sophie Trawalter; Jordan R Axt; M Norman Oliver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Clinician-Patient Movement Synchrony Mediates Social Group Effects on Interpersonal Trust and Perceived Pain.

Authors:  Pavel Goldstein; Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin; Steven R Anderson; Victoria R Schelkun; Tor D Wager
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  The Utility of an Anxiety Screening Measure in Youth With Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders and Clinical Characteristics Associated With Presence of Anxiety.

Authors:  Richa Aggarwal Dutta; Samantha L Ely; Natoshia R Cunningham
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.423

10.  How and Why Patient Concerns Influence Pain Reporting: A Qualitative Analysis of Personal Accounts and Perceptions of Others' Use of Numerical Pain Scales.

Authors:  Brandon L Boring; Kaitlyn T Walsh; Namrata Nanavaty; Brandon W Ng; Vani A Mathur
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.