Literature DB >> 4064832

Early replication banding reveals a strongly conserved functional pattern in mammalian chromosomes.

K von Kiel, H Hameister, I E Somssich, S Adolph.   

Abstract

One of the best documented autosomal linkage associations in man is on chromosome 1p and in the mouse on chromosome 4. On mitotic chromosomes this genetic homology is shown more clearly by early replication banding (RBG; induced by incorporation of 5'bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) in the second half of the S phase) than by structural banding (induced on prefixed chromosomes by denaturation, RFA, or trypsin, GTG). To analyse this phenomenon in more detail, 11 chromosomal regions in man and the domestic cat with known genetic homology were compared. In four chromosome pairs RBG and GTG banding show the same degree of homology. In seven chromosome pairs the homology is more pronounced by RBG than by GTG banding. RFA banding does not reveal the same extent of homology as does RBG banding. These results clearly show a difference between the structural banding pattern, RFA and GTG, and the replication banding pattern, RBG. The following conclusions can be drawn: in chromosomal regions with homologous functions the DNA replicates in the same temporal order. Early replication banding (RBG) reveals a functional pattern in these regions which has been more strongly preserved during evolution than the underlying chromosomal DNA. Differences in chromosomal banding are most prominent in the GTG banding pattern, whereas similarities are most apparent in the RBG banding pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4064832     DOI: 10.1007/BF01259448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  17 in total

1.  Homologous genes for enolase, phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, phosphoglucomutase, and adenylate kinase are syntenic on mouse chromosome 4 and human chromosome 1p.

Authors:  P A Lalley; U Francke; J D Minna
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Replication timing of genes and middle repetitive sequences.

Authors:  M A Goldman; G P Holmquist; M C Gray; L A Caston; A Nag
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Hot spots and functional organization of human chromosomes.

Authors:  J R Korenberg; E Therman; C Denniston
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1978-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Early and later replication patterns of increased resolution in human lymphocyte chromosomes.

Authors:  B Meer; H Hameister; M Cerrillo
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Report of the committee on comparative mapping. Oslo Conference (1981): Sixth International Workshop on Human Gene Mapping.

Authors:  P L Pearson; T H Roderick; M T Davisson; P A Lalley; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1982

6.  In situ nick translation of metaphase chromosomes with biotin-labeled d-UTP.

Authors:  S Adolph; H Hameister
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Chromosomal evolution in primates: tentative phylogeny from Microcebus murinus (Prosimian) to man.

Authors:  B Dutrillaux
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1979-05-10       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Genetic mapping in mammals: chromosome map of domestic cat.

Authors:  S J O'Brien; W G Nash
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-04-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The ancestral karyotype of Carnivora: comparison with that of platyrrhine monkeys.

Authors:  B Dutrillaux; J Couturier
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1983

10.  Patterns of DNA replication of human chromosomes. II. Replication map and replication model.

Authors:  M Camargo; J Cervenka
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  7 in total

1.  A karyotypic analysis of the lesser Malay chevrotain, Tragulus javanicus (Artiodactyla: Tragulidae).

Authors:  D S Gallagher; M L Houck; A M Ryan; J E Womack; A T Kumamoto
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 2.  Chromosome bands, their chromatin flavors, and their functional features.

Authors:  G P Holmquist
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Zoo-FISH analysis: the American mink (Mustela vison) closely resembles the cat karyotype.

Authors:  H Hameister; C Klett; J Bruch; C Dixkens; W Vogel; K Christensen
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 4.  Evolution of chromosome bands: molecular ecology of noncoding DNA.

Authors:  G P Holmquist
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  A comparative mapping study of fragile sites in the human and murine genomes.

Authors:  M Djalali; S Adolph; P Steinbach; H Winking; H Hameister
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  ZOO-FISH analysis: cat and human karyotypes closely resemble the putative ancestral mammalian karyotype.

Authors:  G Rettenberger; C Klett; U Zechner; J Bruch; W Just; W Vogel; H Hameister
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Construction of chromosome-specific paints for meta- and submetacentric autosomes and the sex chromosomes in the horse and their use to detect homologous chromosomal segments in the donkey.

Authors:  T Raudsepp; B P Chowdhary
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.620

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.