Literature DB >> 8581300

ZOO-FISH analysis: cat and human karyotypes closely resemble the putative ancestral mammalian karyotype.

G Rettenberger1, C Klett, U Zechner, J Bruch, W Just, W Vogel, H Hameister.   

Abstract

DNA in situ hybridization with human chromosome specific DNA libraries was applied to compare the karyotypes of humans (Homo sapiens, 2n = 46) and cats (Felis catus, 2n = 38). For the autosomes alone, 30 segments of conserved synteny were revealed. The arrangement of these segments in the feline karyotype differs by only seven single chromosome breaks and one intrachromosomal inversion from their arrangement in humans. Comparison of these data with those recently obtained for pig and those available from conventional gene mapping studies in mice and cattle has allowed us to develop a model of karyotype evolution in mammals. The cat and human karyotypes, with 36 and 44 autosomes respectively, were found to be very similar to a putative ancient mammalian founder karyotype. It would appear that during evolution to the human karyotype the status quo has been conserved for at least some 100-120 million years. There has been no need to alter the well-balanced gene arrangement of the mammalian founder karyotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8581300     DOI: 10.1007/bf00713962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  20 in total

1.  Construction and characterization of plasmid libraries enriched in sequences from single human chromosomes.

Authors:  C Collins; W L Kuo; R Segraves; J Fuscoe; D Pinkel; J W Gray
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.736

2.  Homologies in human and Macaca fuscata chromosomes revealed by in situ suppression hybridization with human chromosome specific DNA libraries.

Authors:  J Wienberg; R Stanyon; A Jauch; T Cremer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries.

Authors:  P Lichter; T Cremer; J Borden; L Manuelidis; D C Ward
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Chromosome maps of man and mouse, III.

Authors:  A G Searle; J Peters; M F Lyon; E P Evans; J H Edwards; V J Buckle
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  Conserved regions of homologous G-banded chromosomes between orders in mammalian evolution: carnivores and primates.

Authors:  W G Nash; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Anchored reference loci for comparative genome mapping in mammals.

Authors:  S J O'Brien; J E Womack; L A Lyons; K J Moore; N A Jenkins; N G Copeland
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Comparative mapping reveals extensive linkage conservation--but with gene order rearrangements--between the pig and the human genomes.

Authors:  M Johansson; H Ellegren; L Andersson
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1995-02-10       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 8.  Mammalian phylogeny: shaking the tree.

Authors:  M J Novacek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Reconstruction of genomic rearrangements in great apes and gibbons by chromosome painting.

Authors:  A Jauch; J Wienberg; R Stanyon; N Arnold; S Tofanelli; T Ishida; T Cremer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The ancestral karyotype of Carnivora: comparison with that of platyrrhine monkeys.

Authors:  B Dutrillaux; J Couturier
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1983
View more
  41 in total

1.  Comparative chromosome painting between marsupial orders: relationships with a 2n = 14 ancestral marsupial karyotype.

Authors:  A A De Leo; N Guedelha; R Toder; L Voullaire; M A Ferguson-Smith; P C O'Brien; J A Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Extensive conservation of sex chromosome organization between cat and human revealed by parallel radiation hybrid mapping.

Authors:  W J Murphy; S Sun; Z Q Chen; J Pecon-Slattery; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Comparative genome maps of the pangolin, hedgehog, sloth, anteater and human revealed by cross-species chromosome painting: further insight into the ancestral karyotype and genome evolution of eutherian mammals.

Authors:  Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Tangliang Li; Beiyuan Fu; Gauthier Dobigny; Jinghuan Wang; Polina L Perelman; Natalya A Serdukova; Weiting Su; Patricia Cm O'Brien; Yingxiang Wang; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Vitaly Volobouev; Wenhui Nie
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Zoo-fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of human and Indian muntjac karyotypes (Muntiacus muntjak vaginalis) reveals satellite DNA clusters at the margins of conserved syntenic segments.

Authors:  L Frönicke; H Scherthan
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Interspecies comparative genome hybridization and interspecies representational difference analysis reveal gross DNA differences between humans and great apes.

Authors:  R Toder; Y Xia; E Bausch
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Reciprocal chromosome painting illuminates the history of genome evolution of the domestic cat, dog and human.

Authors:  F Yang; A S Graphodatsky; P C O'Brien; A Colabella; N Solanky; M Squire; D R Sargan; M A Ferguson-Smith
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Comparative genome organization of vertebrates. The First International Workshop on Comparative Genome Organization.

Authors:  L Andersson; A Archibald; M Ashburner; S Audun; W Barendse; J Bitgood; C Bottema; T Broad; S Brown; D Burt; C Charlier; N Copeland; S Davis; M Davisson; J Edwards; A Eggen; G Elgar; J T Eppig; I Franklin; P Grewe; T Gill; J A Graves; R Hawken; J Hetzel; J Womack
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  A comparative ZOO-FISH analysis in bats elucidates the phylogenetic relationships between Megachiroptera and five microchiropteran families.

Authors:  M Volleth; K G Heller; R A Pfeiffer; H Hameister
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Region-specific YAC banding and painting probes for comparative genome mapping: implications for the evolution of human chromosome 2.

Authors:  T Haaf; P Bray-Ward
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Comparative genomic in situ hybridization (cGISH) analysis on plant chromosomes revealed by labelled Arabidopsis DNA.

Authors:  J F Zoller; Y Yang; R G Herrmann; U Hohmann
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.