Literature DB >> 10584891

High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and anthropometric measures: a case-control study.

E Sala1, R Warren, J McCann, S Duffy, R Luben, N Day.   

Abstract

Mammographic parenchymal patterns are related to breast cancer risk and are also affected by anthropometric measure. We carried out a case-control study comprising 200 cases with high-risk (P2 and DY) mammographic parenchymal pattern and 200 controls with low-risk (N1 and P1) patterns in order to investigate the effect of body size and shape and breast size on mammographic patterns. Women in the highest quartile of body mass index (BMI) distribution were significantly less likely to have a high-risk pattern (odds ratio (OR) = 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.52, P-value for trend = 0.001) compared to those in the lowest quartile. Relative to women with a waist to hip ratio (WHR) of less than 0.75, the OR of having a high-risk pattern in women with a WHR greater than 0.80 was 0.30 (95% CI 0.14-0.63). Breast size as measured by cup size was significantly and negatively related to high-risk pattern. Our study indicates that both BMI and WHR are negatively associated with high-risk patterns. However, both phenomena are associated with increased risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. This negative confounding of two positive risk factors means that the effect of parenchymal patterns on risk will tend to be underestimated when not adjusted for BMI and WHR and vice versa. Thus we may have underestimated the importance of BMI and mammographic parenchymal patterns in the past. Further studies are needed to determine a measure of parenchymal density that is independent of anthropometric measures and breast size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10584891      PMCID: PMC2374338          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  18 in total

1.  Breast cancer risk in relation to serum cholesterol, serum beta-lipoprotein, height, weight, and blood pressure.

Authors:  S A Törnberg; L E Holm; J M Carstensen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Relationship of mammographic parenchymal patterns with breast cancer risk factors and risk of breast cancer in a prospective study.

Authors:  B L de Stavola; I H Gravelle; D Y Wang; D S Allen; R D Bulbrook; I S Fentiman; J L Hayward; M C Chaudary
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Height, weight weight change, and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: The Netherlands Cohort Study.

Authors:  P A van den Brandt; M J Dirx; C M Ronckers; P van den Hoogen; R A Goldbohm
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 4.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  A F Saftlas; M Szklo
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 5.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  A M Oza; N F Boyd
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Effect of family history, body-fat distribution, and reproductive factors on the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  T A Sellers; L H Kushi; J D Potter; S A Kaye; C L Nelson; P G McGovern; A R Folsom
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-05-14       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The relationship between breast asymmetry, breast size and the occurrence of breast cancer.

Authors:  D Scutt; J T Manning; G H Whitehouse; S J Leinster; C P Massey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Plasma lipids, lipoproteins, and mammographic densities.

Authors:  N F Boyd; P Connelly; J Byng; M Yaffe; H Draper; L Little; D Jones; L J Martin; G Lockwood; D Tritchler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1995 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Breast size and mammographic pattern in relation to breast cancer risk.

Authors:  E Thurfjell; C C Hsieh; L Lipworth; A Ekbom; H O Adami; D Trichopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  A nested case-control study of mammographic patterns, breast volume, and breast cancer (New York City, NY, United States).

Authors:  I Kato; C Beinart; A Bleich; S Su; M Kim; P G Toniolo
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity and mammographic breast density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Kathleen Wolin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Mammographic Density and Vitamin D Levels - A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Loreen Straub; Johanna Riedel; Peter B Luppa; Johanna Wissing; Almut Artmann; Marion Kiechle; Vanadin Regina Seifert-Klauss
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Alcohol intake over the life course and mammographic density.

Authors:  Julie D Flom; Jennifer S Ferris; Parisa Tehranifar; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Early-Life and Adult Anthropometrics in Relation to Mammographic Image Intensity Variation in the Nurses' Health Studies.

Authors:  Hannah Oh; Megan S Rice; Erica T Warner; Kimberly A Bertrand; Erin E Fowler; A Heather Eliassen; Bernard A Rosner; John J Heine; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Relationship between breast cancer risk factors and mammographic breast density in the Fernald Community Cohort.

Authors:  L Yaghjyan; M C Mahoney; P Succop; R Wones; J Buckholz; S M Pinney
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Adult weight gain, fat distribution and mammographic density in Spanish pre- and post-menopausal women (DDM-Spain).

Authors:  Marina Pollán; Virginia Lope; Josefa Miranda-García; Milagros García; Francisco Casanova; Carmen Sánchez-Contador; Carmen Santamariña; Pilar Moreo; Carmen Vidal; Mercé Peris; María Pilar Moreno; José Antonio Vázquez-Carrete; Francisca Collado; Carmen Pedraz-Pingarrón; Nieves Ascunce; Dolores Salas-Trejo; Nuria Aragonés; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Francisco Ruiz-Perales
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Early-Life and Adult Adiposity, Adult Height, and Benign Breast Tissue Composition.

Authors:  Hannah Oh; Lusine Yaghjyan; Rebecca J Austin-Datta; Yujing J Heng; Gabrielle M Baker; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Adithya D Vellal; Laura C Collins; Divya Murthy; A Heather Eliassen; Bernard A Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 4.090

8.  Smoking and high-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns: a case-control study.

Authors:  E Sala; R Warren; J McCann; S Duffy; R Luben; N Day
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  1999-11-16       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  Can the stroma provide the clue to the cellular basis for mammographic density?

Authors:  Ruth Warren; Sunil R Lakhani
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Interaction of dense breast patterns with other breast cancer risk factors in a case-control study.

Authors:  S W Duffy; R W Jakes; F C Ng; F Gao
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.