Literature DB >> 405905

Subject acceptance of implanted auditory prosthesis.

R C Bilger, N R Stenson, J L Payne.   

Abstract

Each of the 13 subjects was interviewed, in a structured context, to determine their estimate of the value of the prosthesis to their daily life. The subjects who used their prostheses eight or more hours a day reported it to be more valuable in their daily living than did those who used it less than eight hours a day. The fulltime users reported that the prosthesis is most helpful to them as an adjunct to lipreading. All of them thought the prosthesis valuable in terms of "hearing" environmental sounds. While all of them reported noisy environments to be bothersome, the fulltime users did not turn off their stimulators in noise. Only two subjects, both infrequent users of their prostheses, reported that they would not undergo implant surgery again.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 405905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Physiological basis for a cochlear prosthesis (author's transl)].

Authors:  R Klinke; R Hartmann
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1979

Review 2.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

Review 3.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.