Literature DB >> 4058208

Intraoperative BAER monitoring and hearing preservation in the treatment of acoustic neuromas.

M Abramson, B M Stein, T A Pedley, R G Emerson, J J Wazen.   

Abstract

We treated 20 cases of acoustic neuromas in the last 2 1/2 years using the suboccipital approach with intraoperative monitoring of eighth nerve function in an attempt to preserve hearing. Total tumor removal was accomplished in 18 cases. Three tumors were small (less than 2 cm in size); 3 tumors were moderate sized (2 to 3 cm) and 14 tumors were large (greater than 3 cm). In 15 cases, all BAER components were lost during surgery. These patients had no postoperative hearing. In five patients there was intraoperative preservation of some or all BAER components. These included the three patients with small tumors and two other patients with moderate sized tumors. One patient with a moderate size tumor had preservation of wave 1 only, and had no postoperative speech discrimination. One patient with a small tumor retained all 5 BAER components, but had no postoperative hearing. Three patients in our series retained functional hearing after surgery, including 3 of 5 patients with tumors 2 cm or smaller. Intraoperative BAER monitoring appears to be useful in predicting postoperative hearing. Tumor size seems to be the primary factor in preservation of hearing following acoustic neuroma surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4058208     DOI: 10.1288/00005537-198511000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  12 in total

1.  Inconsistencies in the correlation between loss of brain stem auditory evoked response waves and postoperative deafness.

Authors:  W D Mustain; O al-Mefty; V K Anand
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1992-07

Review 2.  Do evoked potentials have any value in anaesthesia?

Authors:  A M Lam
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Issues in the optimal selection of a cranial nerve monitoring system.

Authors:  S H Selesnick; D F Goldsmith
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1993

4.  Intraoperative cranial nerve monitoring during posterior skull base surgery.

Authors:  J M Kartush; M J Larouere; M D Graham; K R Bouchard; B V Audet
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1991

5.  Changes in directly recorded cochlear nerve compound action potentials during acoustic tumor surgery.

Authors:  V Colletti; A Bricolo; F G Fiorino; L Bruni
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1994

6.  Cochlear nerve action potential monitoring with the microdissector in vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Noritaka Aihara; Shingo Murakami; Nobuhiro Watanabe; Mariko Takahashi; Akira Inagaki; Motoki Tanikawa; Kazuo Yamada
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2009-09

7.  Neurophysiologic monitoring in posterior fossa surgery. II. BAEP-waves I and V and preservation of hearing.

Authors:  E Watanabe; J Schramm; C Strauss; R Fahlbusch
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Clinical features of vestibular schwannomas in patients who experience hearing improvement after surgery.

Authors:  Michihiro Kohno; Shigeo Sora; Hiroaki Sato; Masanobu Shinogami; Hidehiko Yoneyama
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Preservation of cochlear nerve function in acoustic neurinoma surgery.

Authors:  A Yokoh; S Kobayashi; Y Tanaka; H Gibo; K Sugita
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Effects of cerebellar retractions on the cochlear nerve: an experimental study on rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  T Sekiya; A R Møller
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.