Literature DB >> 17170918

Changes in directly recorded cochlear nerve compound action potentials during acoustic tumor surgery.

V Colletti, A Bricolo, F G Fiorino, L Bruni.   

Abstract

Damage to labyrinthine, neural, and vascular structures may possibly account for failure to achieve hearing preservation after removal of small acoustic neuromas. The pathogenesis of auditory impairment is, however, sometimes unclear. Intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials enables us to study possible correlations between surgical maneuvers and the function of auditory structures and pathways. To this end, simultaneous recording of brainstern auditory evoked potentials and direct cochlear nerve action potentials (CNAPs) was utilized in 14 patients with small (12 to 18 mm) unilateral acoustic neuromas. The latency of the first negative component (N(1)) of the CNAPs proved extremely sensitive in detecting intraoperative auditory damage and was a good predictive index of postoperative auditory outcome. Evaluation of temporal and morphologic CNAP patterns allowed identification of coagulation close to the cochlear nerve, drilling of the internal auditory canal, and removal of the intrameatal portion of the tumor, the most critical steps in hearing preservation. The mechanisms of damage are analyzed and discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 17170918      PMCID: PMC1656458          DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1058981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base Surg        ISSN: 1052-1453


  13 in total

1.  Detailed analysis of intraoperative changes monitoring brain stem acoustic evoked potentials.

Authors:  J Schramm; T Mokrusch; R Fahlbusch; A Hochstetter
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Technique of hearing preservation in small acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  P J Jannetta; A R Møller; M B Møller
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Cochlear nerve conduction block: an explanation for spontaneous hearing return after acoustic tumor surgery.

Authors:  J F Kveton; E C Tarlov; G Drumheller; P Katcher; C Abbott
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Intraoperative BAER monitoring and hearing preservation in the treatment of acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  M Abramson; B M Stein; T A Pedley; R G Emerson; J J Wazen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Monitoring auditory nerve potentials during operations in the cerebellopontine angle.

Authors:  A R Møller; P J Jannetta
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Hearing preservation after acoustic tumor removal: long-term results.

Authors:  C Shelton; W E Hitselberger; W F House; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Intraoperative monitoring of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  P A Raudzens; A G Shetter
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  The significance for postoperative hearing of preserving the labyrinth in acoustic neurinoma surgery.

Authors:  M Tatagiba; M Samii; C Matthies; M el Azm; R Schönmayr
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Avulsion rupture of the internal auditory artery during operations in the cerebellopontine angle: a study in monkeys.

Authors:  T Sekiya; A R Møller
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery using intraoperative direct eighth cranial nerve monitoring.

Authors:  H Silverstein; A B McDaniel; H Norrell
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1985-11
View more
  6 in total

1.  Continuous retrograde monitoring of the facial nerve during cerebellopontine angle surgery: normative data.

Authors:  V Colletti; F Fiorino
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1996

2.  Continuous retrograde monitoring of the facial nerve: preliminary experience during acoustic neuroma surgery.

Authors:  V Colletti; F G Fiorino
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1996

3.  Advantages of a new, atraumatic, self-retaining electrode for direct cochlear nerve monitoring.

Authors:  M J Ruckenstein; R A Cueva; G R Prioleau
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1997

4.  Cochlear nerve action potential monitoring with the microdissector in vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Noritaka Aihara; Shingo Murakami; Nobuhiro Watanabe; Mariko Takahashi; Akira Inagaki; Motoki Tanikawa; Kazuo Yamada
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2009-09

5.  Intraoperative monitoring during surgery for acoustic neuroma: benefits of an extratympanic intrameatal electrode.

Authors:  N Mullatti; H B Coakham; A R Maw; S R Butler; M H Morgan
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Preoperative characteristics of auditory brainstem response in acoustic neuroma with useful hearing: importance as a preliminary investigation for intraoperative monitoring.

Authors:  Noritaka Aihara; Shingo Murakami; Mariko Takahashi; Kazuo Yamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.742

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.