Literature DB >> 17170916

Issues in the optimal selection of a cranial nerve monitoring system.

S H Selesnick, D F Goldsmith.   

Abstract

Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) is a safe technique that is of clear clinical value in the preservation of cranial nerves in skull base surgery and is rapidly becoming the standard of care. Available nerve monitoring systems vary widely in capabilities and costs. A well-informed surgeon may best decide on monitoring needs based on surgical case selection, experience, operating room space, availability of monitoring personnel, and cost. Key system characteristics that should be reviewed in the decision-making process include the monitoring technique (electromyography, pressure transducer, direct nerve monitoring, brainstem auditory evoked potential) and the stimulus technique (stimulating parameters, probe selection). In the past, IONM has been primarily employed in posterior fossa and temporal bone surgery, but the value of IONM is being recognized in more skull base and head and neck surgeries. Suggested IONM strategies for specific surgeries are presented.

Year:  1993        PMID: 17170916      PMCID: PMC1656448          DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1060588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skull Base Surg        ISSN: 1052-1453


  26 in total

1.  The efficacy of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in acoustic tumor surgery.

Authors:  J F Kveton
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 2.  Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring: II. Facial nerve function.

Authors:  J K Niparko; P R Kileny; J L Kemink; H M Lee; M D Graham
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1989-01

3.  Bells against palsy.

Authors:  J D Williams; R Lehman
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1988-01

4.  Intraoperative monitoring of the facial nerve.

Authors:  S G Harner; J R Daube; C W Beatty; M J Ebersold
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Improved preservation of facial nerve function in the infratemporal approach to the skull base.

Authors:  J P Leonetti; D E Brackmann; R L Prass
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Neurophysiologic monitoring in posterior fossa surgery. II. BAEP-waves I and V and preservation of hearing.

Authors:  E Watanabe; J Schramm; C Strauss; R Fahlbusch
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Facial nerve grading system.

Authors:  J W House; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Constant-current versus constant-voltage stimulation.

Authors:  R Prass; H Lüders
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Hearing preservation following suboccipital removal of acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  J L Kemink; M J LaRouere; P R Kileny; S A Telian; J T Hoff
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  The small acoustic tumour; a chance to preserve hearing.

Authors:  J S Compton; L T Bordi; A D Cheeseman; J Sabin; L Symon
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring of ocular motor nerves under conditions of partial neuromuscular blockade during skull base surgery.

Authors:  M Kawaguchi; H Ohnishi; T Sakamoto; K Shimizu; J Karasawa; H Furuya
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1996
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.